The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Evaluate the success of the Constitutional principles of separation of powers and checks and balances in addressing concerns about the government under the Articles of Confederation
In reality, it was successful because the Articles of Confederation had many deficiencies. For instance, under the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak. The states were the ones that were sovereign and independent and has the advantage that they could collect taxes. Congress couldn't. So if the government needed money, it was through the states.
So when the delegates met at the Constitutional Congress of 1787 in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, they debated the best form of government for the United States and decided to have a division of powers under the system of checks and balances in which none of the branches had more power over the others.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Sui dynasty, Wade-Giles (Wendi) romanization Sui, (581–618 ce), short-lived Chinese dynasty that unified the country after four centuries of fragmentation in which North and South China had gone quite different ways.
Answer:
He supported the quick restoration of the seceded states to the Union without protection for the former slaves
Explanation:
Andrew Johnson's provocative action leading the radical republicans in congress to seek his ouster is that "he supported the quick restoration of the seceded states to the Union without protection for the former slaves."
Before the American Civil war in 1861, it was only the majority of the North and Republicans that supported the abolition of slavery. Hence, following the loss of Confederates/Seceded states after the War in 1865, and the subsequent assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson becoming the new President of the United States " supported the quick restoration of the seceded states to the Union without protection for the former slaves." This situation led to Congress inclined along Republicans to seek his impeachment
Umm, you didn't upload an image.
I don't know what the "followings" are, but I can tell you that Tenement buildings had no interest in caring for the people who lived there. Tenement housing had its people share bathrooms, there were no lights(besides the window), and the rooms were small and cramped.
