Answer:
I think the answer is to persuade listeners to embrace democratic freedoms
Explanation:
I don't know if its right though
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The author's purpose or reason for writing this editorial was to inform and make people conscious about the terrible oil spill in April 2010in the Gulf of México, with the explosion of a British Petroleum rig. This spill caused so much damage to the ecosystem and the environment of the Gulf of México.
The two details from the text that support the answer are the following. The author, Kate Jackson, writes that the BP company knew about the possibility of an accident of this magnitude but it didn't do anything to prevent it. She said that David Rainey, an executive form British Petroleum, had assured the members of the Senate that the facility had no risk of a spill.
The other detail that supports the answer is that she wrote that the oil industry always had been aware of the dangers of spills but never has done so much to prevent them. Also, people like Robert Bea, an offshore engineer, had warned British Petroleum.
Things like heroin and do not get off topic with different types of drugs express 3-4 drugs and their effects explaining why youths shouldn't use them.
This question is completely up to your personal experiences, and therefore I can't answer it unless I know you personally.
But I will give an explanation to what prejudice is so you can answer your question yourself.
<em>Prejudice is somewhat similar to discrimination, where you judge people based on what group they belong to (etc. race, gender, sexuality) without reason. Something similar to racism. People can be prejudiced because they belong to any group.</em>
<em />
I hope you can answer the question well. :)
