Answer:
Hence the answer is given as follows,
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Because the couple is divorced, the IRS must apportion the deficiency between Mr. and Mrs. Pitt based on their relative contribution to their 2015 taxable income.
Explanation:
Because Mr and Mrs Pitt filed for a joint tax return in 2017 and got divorced in 2018 and IRS audited their tax return and found that they both underpaid their tax, the IRS must apportion the deficiency 50-50 between both of them based on their separate returns.
Answer:
A. $6,400
B. $240
C. $1,000,000
D. $30,000
Explanation:
Requirement A, C, and D:
Prizes and awards are taxable income for a taxpayer. Any awards or prizes won from the lottery or television should be added to the income. Therefore, the Winning lottery is a taxable income for Kerry, $1,000,000. Again, Receiving the award for scientific research is also taxable income for Deborah, $30,000.
The winning award for accomplishments is also a taxable income. So, receiving a $6,400 worth gift bag is a taxable income for Cheline.
Requirement B:
There is an exception if the award is for tangible property and a long-years of accomplishment. At that time, the taxpayers will be excluded from some part of the necessary amounts to be paid as tax. If it is not a qualified award, the exclusion will be $400. If it is qualified, the tax exclusion is 1,600. Since Jon received a gold watch for 25 years of service and the gift is not qualified, he has to pay tax for $(660 - 400) = $240.
Answer:
Total sales variance $87,340 Favorable
See report below
Explanation:
The sales budget for the month of June would like as follows:
Budgeted Sales
Product units Price Total($)
A 40,000 $7 280,000
B 39,000 $9 351,000
Actual sales
Product units Price Total($)
A 39,000 $7.10 276,900
B 49,600 $8.90 441440
Sales Budget Report for the month of June 2019
Budget Actual Variance ($)
A 280,000 276,900 3,100 Unfavorable
B 351,000 441,440 <u>90,440 </u>favorable
Total sales variance <u> 87,340 Favorable</u>
Answer: The National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign launched the “Above the Influence” (ATI) ad campaign in 2005. The campaign aims to provide young people with a different perspective on life. The campaign’s primary initiative is to reduce drug abuse among teenagers, not just by telling them about the harmful effects of drugs, but by helping them to counter bad influences (such as peer pressure) and believe in themselves. This campaign used print media, the Internet, television, and radio to communicate its message to teenagers.
The primary effects of this ad campaign on the youth in my locality were in terms of the immediate awareness that the ad’s message created. The campaign focused on improving lifestyles rather than just highlighting the bad effects of drugs, so it was able to connect with its target audience. Another key reason for the campaign’s success was the use of multiple media formats to communicate with the target audience.
An important secondary effect of this ad campaign was that it succeeded in spreading awareness about how peer pressure leads people into drug abuse. The campaign’s partnership with schools and other community groups helped to increase its effect on students in their early teens. Another secondary effect of the campaign was a decrease in the long-term use of marijuana and other illicit drugs among teenagers. The campaign managed to foster a feeling of independence and self-assurance among teens over the years.
The message of this ad campaign is still fresh in my mind. I’m sure it had a lasting effect on many others who heard it because it succeeded in building public awareness about the problem of drug abuse and in promoting a positive lifestyle.
Explanation:I got it of edmentum
