Answer:
A. Applying different analytical approaches.
Explanation:
In decision making, it is advisable to apply different analytical approaches. In doing this, you are able to know the pros and cons of the different approaches.
This will thus help one narrow options for increased decision-making effectiveness.
Answer:
b. Starbucks did not factor in the international dimension of the external environment
Explanation:
Starbucks was guilty of ethnocentrism because they were negligent in not evaluating or performed inadequate evaluation of the culture of French people and may have assumed erroneously due to preconceptions originating in the standards and customs, that the whole of Europe had the same culture.
Whereas the English and German people could grab a coffee on the go, the French prefer to sit and chat over coffee, and this fact was obviously ignored at the product launch stage.
Based on the scenario above, it is likely that Professor
Plum’s salary that is considered to be at its highest was at 1970 whereas the
lowest was during the 1990 and this could be based from CPI in which will
evaluate his salary from where it became highest and lowest.
Answer:
Winners
- 3rd National, a bank that loaned many people money for home purchases.
Losers
- Karen, a retired school teacher that relies upon her fixed pension to pay for her expenses.
- Herb, who keeps his savings in an old coffee can.
- Joy, who has borrowed $40,000 to pay her college education.
- The US federal government which had almost $15 trillion in debt in 2011.
Explanation:
When unexpected inflation occurs, the usual plan to by Monetary Institutions of a country is raising the interest rates.
By doing that, they want to stop it or slowly decelerate it.
So that it becomes more expensive to take a loan, the idea is to reduce consumption.
In Economics, it's a bad scenario after all. Few winners. Many losers.
So, let's examine them
Winners
- 3rd National, a bank that loaned many people money for home purchases.
At first, The 3rd National is going to be winning since the value of the debt will rise, depending on the type of contract and an increase in the interest rate will demand corrections on the monthly payments. But on the other hand, the number of default clients and overdue installments will raise for sure.
Losers
- Karen, a retired school teacher that relies upon her fixed pension to pay for her expenses.
Inflation reduces the real buying value of her checks. And her pension can't grow otherwise this will feed the inflation too.
- Herb, who keeps his savings in an old coffee can.
Since his money is not invested then He's not having any earning that might give him some compensation. So his money is even more devalued.
- Joy, who has borrowed $40,000 to pay her college education.
Depending on the contract Joy might be sleepless. Either her monthly payments will become more expensive or She may experience difficulties because of the weekly growing prices.
- The US federal government had almost $15 trillion in debt in 2011.
Certainly, the president and his secretary will have to address the fact that due to inflation and the chosen medicine make the nation's debt up to the sky. They must renegotiate the payment deadlines.
