Answer:
e. the bullwhip effect
Explanation:
Supply chain management can be defined as the effective and efficient management of the flow of goods and services as well as all of the production processes involved in the transformation of raw materials into finished products that meet the insatiable want and need of the consumers.
Generally, the supply chain management involves all the activities associated with planning, execution and supply of finished goods and services to the consumers.
Therefore, the fundamental principle on which supply chain management is reliant on, is the complete collaboration between multiple firms. These multiple firms include a company that is saddled with the responsibility of manufacturing producer), a wholesaler, and a retailer who typically sells the products to the customers or consumers.
Basically, these three (3) firms or individuals are required to collaborate with each other so as to meet the needs of the customers in a timely manner or fashion and at a fair price too.
However, uncertainties or fluctuations in the supply chain can lead to the bullwhip effect.
The bullwhip effect is also referred to as the Forrester effect and it can be defined as the increasing inefficient allocation of resources or inventory fluctuations (distortions) due to changes in demand with respect to the upward movement in supply chain i.e from the retailer to wholesaler and to the manufacturer. Thus, this inaccurate assessment of the demands of consumers leads to uncertainties or fluctuations in the supply chain, especially a decrease in the accuracy of the forecast made by a manufacturer (supplier).
Answer:
The correct answer is the following combination: Increase; indefinite change.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the microeconomics theory when it comes to the rise of the price of a product the factors of major impact will be the inputs needed in the production of final good. In this particular case, the fact that the price of the milk has increased it will afect directly the price of the cheese in a matter of going up. And that consequently will afect the quantity demanded by going down. However, due to the fact that now the price of the bagels, a complement of the cheese, has gone down then it is indefinite to known what will happen to the quantity demanded of the cheese due to the fact that this last factor will impact it positively. So in the end, the two situations affect the quantity to a matter of indefinite change.
It is B. and now i have to type more to get this answer posted
Answer:
Bundle 1: Beer = 2; Pizza = 6
Bundle 2: Beer = 3; Pizza = 4
Bundle 3: Beer = 4; Pizza = 3
Bundle 4: Beer = 12; Pizza = 1
Explanation:
Given that;
Lisa utility function UF(X,Y) = 4XY
where;
X = beer
Y = Pizza
The utility level = 48
so, UF(X,Y) = 4XY
putting different values of X (i.e beer ) given to us in this equation, we can calculate the values of Y(i.e pizza) to fulfill the utility
So; when X (beer) = 2
48 = 4×2×Y
48 = 8Y
Y = 48/8
Y = 6
Thus, Bundle 1: Beer = 2; Pizza = 6
when X (beer) = 3
48 = 4×3×Y
48 = 12 Y
Y = 48/12
Y = 4
Thus; Bundle 2: Beer = 3; Pizza = 4
when X (beer) = 4
48 = 4×4×Y
48 = 16 Y
Y = 48/16
Y = 3
Thus; Bundle 3: Beer = 4; Pizza = 3
when X(beer) = 12
48 = 4×12×Y
48 = 48 Y
Y = 48/48
Y = 1
Thus; Bundle 4: Beer = 12; Pizza = 1
Answer:
75 shares
Explanation:
In this specific scenario, it seems that Kevin is treated to 75 shares prior to the redemption. This is calculated by adding the 50 shares that Kevin holds directly prior to the redemption itself as well as the 25 extra shares that are held by AMI. These 25 shares are 50% of the total 50 shares that AMI holds since Kevin is a 50% partner.
