Answer:
The criticism is true to a certain degree, and unjustified to another degree.
Explanation:
It is true in the sense that the U.S. has indeed lost a lot of manufacturing to Mexico, simply because Mexico has far lower labor costs, and U.S. manufacturers have decided to take advantage of that by taking their plants to Mexican states.
It is also true that Mexico has been running a trade surplus with the United States in recent years, mainly because of the large manufacturing sector that Mexico has been developing.
On the other hand, the criticism is unjustified because neither a trade deficit nor the moving of manufacturing to Mexico mean that the United States as a whole is in worst condition than before NAFTA. In fact, most economists agree that free trade is a good thing for the economy as a whole, and that most people benefit from the lower costs and specialization that trade brings about.
The problem lies then, in the people who lose their jobs: formerly unionized manufacturing workers from the Rust Belt, for example. These people need to be helped with government assitance, both in terms of welfare, and training, so that they can find new jobs and make ends meet in the meanwhile.
Answer:
At one time, the centrally planned economy of China encouraged farmers to produce iron in their backyards, rather than have factories make iron. This proved unsuccessful, since most of the farmers' iron was of poor quality. Why do you think this approach was unsuccessful? How could this experiment become a success in a free market economy?
The reason why the approach whereby farmers make iron in their backyard could not work out is as a result of not being inclined in that market as they are only skilled in agriculture, also they do not understand the rhetorics of the business.
The experiment would be a success in a free market as anyone is allowed to sell such product, this gives room for competition and helps to price reduction which is good for the consumers, also it would help in improvement of such product's quality because of competition involved
Explanation:
M1 and M2 are the 2 main official measure of money.
M1 measures more liquid assets that are easily accessible to the owner including cash and checking accounts. M2 measures all of M1 plus "near money" which is money tied up in investments like savings, mutual funds, and other investments.
The over time rate of pay is $22.5 overtime per hour. While the total gross pay at 43 hours is 667.5 dollars.
a. The regular salary = $2600 monthly
The annual salary = $2600 * 12
= 31200 dollars.
The weekly salary in a year
We have 52 weeks in a year
Weekly salary = 31200/52
= 600 dollars.
She works for 40 hours weekly.
Pay per hour = 600/40
= 15
The overtime pay per hour that Rebecca receives
= 15 * 1.5
= 22.5
Therefore Huang's overtime pay is 22.5 dollars.
b. If she works 43 hours during the week
15 dollars * 40 hours = 600 dollars
43-40 = 3 overtime hours
3 x 22.50 per hour = 67.5 dollars.
The total gross wages = 600 dollars + 67.5 dollars
= 667.5 dollars.
Read more on brainly.com/question/13887624?referrer=searchResults
The correct answer is extra commissions.
Travel agencies will often recommend a preferred supplier because they are receiving extra commissions from the suppliers. The extra commissions do not necessarily need to be in cash. Often the extra commissions will be in the form of things like trips, free hotel rooms and cruises for the travel agents.
