All categories

2 years ago

.

Business

2 answers:

Ymorist [56]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

the right answer is "B. The children should manage their own weekly allowances."

Explanation:

trust me ;)

kobusy [5.1K]2 years ago

5 0

Hi!

Option C is correct.

Explanation of the choices:

A. - This seems a good choice, however it's not the best choice. Let's come back to it.

B. - This is the best choice because they get to experience first-hand how to manage and make their own money decisions. Choice A might seem good at first, but we can see this is better because they get to make their own decisions and experience hands-on how to do it.

C - This is not a good choice, because it's best to expose children early so they can grow up knowing how to do it.

D - This choice doesn't make sense. What is the point of money if you store it away and don't spend it? This will likely not be a good lesson in the future.

Hope this helps! :D

You might be interested in

Suppose at December 31 of a recent year, the following information (in thousands) was available for sunglasses manufacturer Oakl

Leviafan [203]

Answer and Explanation:

The computation is shown below:

a. The inventory turnover is

= Cost of Goods Sold ÷ Average Inventory

= $351,050 ÷ ($170,000 + $125,000) ÷ 2

= $351,050 ÷ $147,500

= 2.38 times

b. Now days in inventory is

= 365 ÷ inventory turnover ratio

= 365 ÷ 2.38 times

= 153.36 days

4 0

3 years ago

Yakov is skilled at making both bracelets and necklaces. Yakov has no preference between making bracelets or necklaces since he

weqwewe [10]

Answer:b. It shifts to the left

Explanation:

The supply will increases as price increases and vice versa. When the price increases and supply also increases the supply curves shifts to the right and when the price decreases and supply equally decreases supply curves shifts to the left.

In the above scenario since bracelet and necklace are exclusive products the sellers will be willing to supply more of necklace since the price has increased and less of bracelet since the price has fallen and the fall in price which leads to fall in supply of bracelet will shift bracelet supply curves to the left.

6 0

4 years ago

Mike Tyson earned about $200 million over his 15-year boxing career, but by 2003 he was in financial trouble. This is an example

erastovalidia [21]

Mike Tyson earned about $200 million during his career. However, in 2003 he was in financial trouble. This an example of poor management skills. If he had of invested his money wisely. not spent his money on things not needed, and not overindulged in a lavish lifestyle, he would still have this money or more today.

3 0

3 years ago

Adding expectancy theory to the model of motivation and performance illustrates how the interaction of valence, expectancy, and

leonid [27]

Answer:

Instrumentality

Reward they want

Explanation:

_Instrumentality_ highlights how intended effort can turn into actual effort if employee believe their hard work will __result in rewards they want_.

Employees tends to be motivated toward the work when reward are attractive. The intended effort is then turned to actual effort when they are being awarded accordingly and this allow them to perform their job successfully.

The process of turning the intended effort to actual effort is termed Instrumentality and their performance will results in reward they want.

5 0

3 years ago

Horizontal Analysis Total assets were $1,000,000 in 2019, $900,000 in 2018, and $950,000 in 2017. What was the percentage change

Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

(a) Decreases by 5.3%.

(b) Increases by 11%.

Explanation:

Given that,

Total assets in 2019 = $1,000,000

Total assets in 2018 = $900,000

Total assets in 2017 = $950,000

Percentage change from 2017 to 2018:

= [(Total assets in 2018 - Total assets in 2017) ÷ Total assets in 2017] × 100

= [($900,000 - $950,000) ÷ $950,000] × 100

= (-$50,000 ÷ $950,000) × 100

= -0.053

= -5.3%

Therefore, the total assets from 2017 to 2018 decreases by 5.3 percent.

Percentage change from 2018 to 2019:

= [(Total assets in 2019 - Total assets in 2018) ÷ Total assets in 2018] × 100

= [($1,000,000 - $900,000) ÷ $900,000] × 100

= ($100,000 ÷ $900,000) × 100

= 0.11

= 11%

Therefore, the total assets from 2018 to 2019 increases by 11 percent.

7 0

3 years ago