The New York City draft riots were against drafting because of the racial backlash against the Emancipation Proclamation.
Hitler and Mussolini were more similar than different. Here is a list of reasons why this is the case.
1) Both rose to power during a time of crisis/instability- Hitler rose through the political ranks after the Germany economy suffered terribly due to the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles. Mussolini also rose to power at the same time, thanks to the instability of the Italian government.
2) Both eliminated other political parties- Mussolini and Hitler both got rid of their political opposition through force during their reigns.
3) Both censored the media- Controlling the media is one way in which both controlled their societies. By showing themselves in the best possible light, Hitler and Mussolini gained support from their citizens.
4) Both were totalitarian leaders- This meant that both men had complete control over their respective countries.
Answer:
I would find that the most significant change in the Renaissance would be the art, not only because the art itself has inspired artists for generations, but because it is usually the first thing you think of when you hear the word. The Renaissance was an amazing time to be an artist because it was the revival of art, and was more open to free speech, political commentary, and overall just expression of the self. Most paintings and sculptures from this time period are also widely known by most people today, such as the Mona Lisa, The Last Supper, Michaelangelo's David, which are recognizable to almost anyone. These artists often used their art to express their religious beliefs, such as Michaelangelo's work, where he fit so many biblical references into the Sistine Chapel ceiling, and put up with the painful work not only for the commission, but because he felt it was his calling from God
Explanation:
Much of what I know of Adams's views on the French Revolution as it was happening is in reading parts of his letters to Thomas Jefferson as they appear in the book John Adams, by David McCollough. Adams was not against the revolution so much as he was against the extreme violence and methods that he pretty much equated as indiscriminate murder. He differed with Jefferson in this, as Jefferson held that the executions of the aristocracy and heads of institutions that supported them were necessary and signaled to the world there was no going back. Both Adams and Jefferson lost French friends to the revolution. Adams was of the opinion that the FR was resulting in replacing the tyranny of the few with the tyranny of the majority and that the excesses of the committee would lead to catastrophy in the end. Consequently, Adams developed a less than cordial esteem for the the leaders, while retaining hope for the French people in general. He had no love for the French agents the committee sent to America to drum up popular support for France and against Great Britain. These people caused serious problems for Adams as president and contributed greatly to the split in friendship with Jefferson that lasted for years.
