Answer: MLK
Explanation:
I will pick MLK because he was a true speaker and motivated people to do the right thing. MLK changed history
Answer:
2. Liam found a summer job walking dogs in his neighbourhood
Explanation:
"Entrepreneurship is the process of designing, launching and running a new business, which is often initially a small business. The people who create these businesses are called entrepreneurs."
He created his own business
Answer:
The Federalists supported the new U.S Constitution and fought to replace the Articles of Confederation because the Articles of Confederation were weak and caused disruption in the newly independent United States.
The Articles of Confederation had a weak central government (because of the fear of the British monarchy), had no national currency, and lots of other issues. This caused chaos in the US. The 13 independent states were basically allies in a "confederation" and not united. Each state had their own currency and the federal government couldn't raise taxes and had no real power.
This lead to a poorly formed United States of America that just got independence.
The Federalists wanted to fix these issues that the Articles of Confederation failed to address, but in order to do that, they supported a <em>strong</em> federal government (even if it was run by the people). Of course, the people who supported the Articles objected to this (because of the fear of tyranny). To compromise, the Federalists wrote a Bill of Rights to protect the rights of citizens and states from the new federal government.
The Federalists did solve the issue of a national currency, federal power, and taxes. Once the US Constitution was set in place, the federal government and the US was doing better than it was back with the Articles.
Fun Fact: When the representatives were meeting to make the US Constitution, they broke the law because the Articles of Confederation forbid this. You could only revise the Articles, not write a completely separate and new document.
Hoped this helped!
Answer:
farmers, herdsmen, fishermen, and artisans
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think what could have happened to the nation if the Missouri Compromise had not passed was that events, incidents, differences, and debates would have caused the premature beginning of the American Civil War in 1820.
Those years were a time of too much tension. The issue of slavery had already divided the nation.
That moment really illustrated the dichotomy of American society's attitudes about slavery in the early 19th century.
The context of the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that there were many problems with slavery in the states. Some approved and depended on slavery, others -mostly the Northern states- disapproved and supported desegregation. In 1819, Missouri asked to enter the Union as a slave state, breaking the balance between supporters and non-supporters. By passing the Missouri compromise, the US Congress had an opportunity to soothe the complicated situation. It granted the Missouri request, and at the same time, Main was admitted as a free state.
