Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?
After that, start thinking of why.
Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.
No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,
Hope I could help!
According to the author of the text, Karl Marx is the most prominent representative of indeterminism.
Some cases of non-deterministic explanations are consistent with deterministic metaphysics and simply indicate epistemological uncertainty about certain outcomes. For example, if you buy scratch cards, chances are you won't get anything.
Karl Marx He is a 19th century German philosopher. He worked mainly in the field of political philosophy and was a well-known advocate of communism. He was co-author of the Communist Manifesto and author of Capitalism, together forming the foundation of Marxism.
Marx denounced capitalism as a system that alienates the masses. His reasoning is as follows: Workers produce goods for the market, but market forces, not workers, control goods. People must work for the capitalists who have full control over the means of production and who hold power in the workplace.
Learn more about indeterminism at
brainly.com/question/6501276
#SPJ4
The Republicans, they took control of all state governships, and legislatures.
It's Asian rice, all the others are new world....
There are a few ways that this can be done. I will list the ones I know off the top of my head, as this is a broad question. I will be describing this as if the reader is a political scientist so don't take it personally, it's just so you can better understand.
Cherry Picking: Say you want to get a poll. Don't go to an area where there is a majority of the working class. You wan't to go to areas that are high on welfare, stock brokers, corporate etc. You can best find these in big cities like New York, Orlando, so on. That way, when people see the polls, they will look at what are demographic is, giving them the sense that we are popular party.
Fabrication: Don't worry about the legitimacy. Most people just want some sort of facts or explanation, and if we make one up that it is believable for most people, we are good. So long as they don't look at the actual ice caps and the temperature around the world, as far as they know Global Warming is a thing, *cough* I mean, sorry not Global Warming, Climate Change, it's totally different *wink, wink*.
Censorship: So long as no one sees any contradicting evidence to our polls, they are good. Same thing with Climate Change. If however something does come up we need to treat is as if it is absurd. Conspiracy theorist! But even then we need to make sure that it stays away from public eye, and public opinion.
Hope this helps, don't want to keep you waiting much longer.
