Answer:
Under the Truth in Lending Act a consumer obtains a loan that is secured by a principal residence the has the right to rescind in three business days with the exception of a purchase and construction of a principle residence. This statement is TRUE.
Explanation:
The 'Truth in Lending Act' ( TILA) ensures that there is a specific way informed to use credit cards. It promotes the exposure of its terms and costs so that there is a standard way of calculating the cost of loan borrowing. This is a federal law in which lenders are required to provide clients with all the information of loan cost so that they can compare various loans that are given.
Under this act, debtors can cancel certain transactions for a period of three days from the date of transaction or the date from which notice has been given of their right to withdraw, whichever is later. Thus, the statement is TRUE.
Different powers allowed the state government a certain level of independence for making decisions in term of what regulation should be created and which programs would benefit the citizens the most.
Not needing to get the federal government's approval will make these overall process much faster for the citizens.
The term “sense of ownership” is frequently cited as a significant characteristic of community development. While there is increasing use of the terms ownership or sense of ownership, there is a paucity of research regarding what these terms mean, how this body of knowledge influences community development, and the various approaches that can be applied in contemporary community research and practice. A sense of ownership in community development is described as a concept through which to assess whose voice is heard, who has influence over decisions, and who is affected by the process and outcome. Applying the concept of ownership can determine how the strategic interests and actions of individuals or organizations contribute to community development efforts. In addition, the potential for ownership can be understood in part by examining the capacity for and quality of trust. Implications are discussed regarding how the concept of ownership advances the current field, specifically regarding community development research and practice.
Answer:
FIRST: You had tell the person that you were going to start an action against them to be heard in "court". You had to bring witnesses with you so your witnesses could testify that the person was told why you were bringing an action, and that you had given this person a date, time, and location that they had to appear in court to defend themselves.
SECOND: You had to post a written notice near the courthouse that clearly stated the names of both parties, the charges, and the date, time, and location of your first trip to court on this action.
FIRST TIME IN COURT: The first trip gave both parties a chance to speak before a judge. If the judge felt there was enough cause, that judge would assign a trial date. That trial date had to be posted as well.
JURY SELECTION, TRIAL BY JURY: To be on a jury, you had to be a citizen. You had to be over 30 years of age. You had to swear that you would be fair to both sides. You did get paid. Juries were selected from volunteers. The number of jurors could be huge. Some trials had as many as 500 jurors who had volunteered to judge a case. Only the jury could bring in a decision that someone was guilty or innocent. The judge only kept order, but could not decide a trial outcome.
THE TRIAL: Both sides presented their case. Then the jurors voted. Majority ruled.
PUNISHMENT: Punishments varied. If found guilty, both sides, the person bringing the charge and the person being charged, suggested a punishment. The jury could not choose a third choice. They had to choice one suggestion or the other.
Explanation:
