1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
3 years ago
11

if you know about how in upper and lower Canada the people were starting to fight for a better life and more rights for the peop

le, what were the things that the people were unhappy about? please answer need help
Social Studies
1 answer:
Jlenok [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

They were furious with political reform.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Suggest reasons for the increase in extinction rates in recent decades
marishachu [46]

due to the rise of trophy hunting the which hunting animals to have on display some animals have been over hunted which why we have endangered species.

5 0
3 years ago
compare two ways in which destructive relashioships influence your well being as opposed to constructive relationships​
natta225 [31]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
1. Which polynomial is equal to (4x^2 - 3x - 1)+(-3x^2 + 5x - 8)
12345 [234]

Answer:

  1. B).
  2. B).

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Rules of replacement are acceptable because the rules capture an important idea about logical equivalence.
s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

The answer is "Option b".

Explanation:

Logically, the replacement of rule is the rule of substitution that could only lead to a specific part of the logical expression, it is identical phrases will start replacing each other within the structure of valid logic.  

  • It is the probabilistic reasoning, replacement laws are applicable to manipulate initiatives.  
  • This rule of inference is being used only for the whole linear combination, that can be substituted by a rule of substitution.
7 0
3 years ago
Suppose there is a policy debate over imposing trade restrictions on imported semiconductors in the United States. A political p
jolli1 [7]

Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.

Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.

This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.

The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the vegetation of Songhai?
    6·1 answer
  • _____ involves delivering a specific message to an in-person audience.
    12·1 answer
  • A system in which groups of people are divided into layers according to their relative power, property, and prestige is referred
    9·1 answer
  • ANSWER THIS PLEASE .IT ID A IMPORTANT TASK FOR ME
    7·2 answers
  • Lamar has just gotten a new job and is attending a company party where he will meet his colleagues for the first time. His boss
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is considered a push factory
    9·1 answer
  • What two river valley civilizations
    10·1 answer
  • Explain this statement- "Internal changes within the air, water, soil and sound around us is called pollution".​
    8·1 answer
  • What did the Patriots use to win the undecideds to their cause
    7·1 answer
  • MULTIPLE CHOICE: Choose the best answer
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!