Answer:
Luis’s, because he flipped the inequality sign when he subtracted
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
7.2b + 6.5 > 4.8b – 8.1.
Amelia started by subtracting 7.2b from both sides to get 6.5 > –2.4b – 8.1.
Amelia:
7.2b + 6.5 - 7.2b > 4.8b – 8.1 - 7.2b
6.5 > -2.4b - 8.1
Correct
Luis started by subtracting 4.8b from both sides to get 2.4b + 6.5 < – 8.1.
7.2b + 6.5 - 4.8b > 4.8b – 8.1 - 4.8b
2.4b + 6.5 > -8.1
Incorrect
Shauna started by subtracting 6.5 from both sides to get 7.2b > 4.8b – 14.6
7.2b + 6.5 - 6.5 > 4.8b – 8.1 - 6.5
7.2b > 4.8b - 14.6
Correct
Clarence started by adding 8.1 to both sides to get 7.2b + 14.6 > 4.8b.
7.2b + 6.5 + 8.1 > 4.8b – 8.1 + 8.1
7.2b + 14.6 > 4.8b
Correct
Graph1-Yes
Graph2-yes
Graph 3- NO
Graph4-yes
Graph5-No
Graph6/No
Answer:
finding the number of equal-sized parts into which a number can be split
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us split the number 80 into 10 equal parts.
80 = 8 + 8 + 8 + 8 + 8 + 8 + 8 + 8 + 8 + 8
= 8 + 8 + 8 +...to 10 times
= 8(10)
or 
So, if N is any number and p is one of its equal part, then the number of parts into which N is split by p is 
.
Hence, finding the number of equal-sized parts is best modeled with a division expression.
Answer:
the statement that is not supported by the trend in this scatter plot is that each additional pound adds about 1 hour of cooking time. (last option)
