Answer:
Suppose a senator considers introducing a bill to legislate a minimum hourly wage of $12.50.
Wage Labor Demanded Labor Supplied
$12.50 375,000 625,000
This will result in a surplus of labor (625,000 higher than 375,000)
Which of the following statements are true?
- Binding minimum wages cause structural unemployment. As with all price floors, a deadweight loss results, because the quantity supplied is much greater than the quantity demanded. In this case, the price of labor is the wage, and the deadweight loss = structural unemployment
-
In the absence of price controls, a surplus puts downward pressure on wages until they fall to the equilibrium.
Since a labor surplus exists, the price of labor should start to decrease in order to match the equilibrium price.
-
If the minimum wage is set at $12.50, the market will not reach equilibrium. The quantity supplied of labor is much greater than the quantity demanded for labor resulting in a surplus.
Answer:
$0.15 hours per unit
Explanation:
Given that
Direct material cost = $16
Assume Direct labor cost = X
Manufacturing overheads = $18
Profit margin = 20%
Direct labor per hour cost = $28
The computation of direct labor-hour input is shown below:-
Total manufacturing cost = X + $34
Total cost of goods sold = (X + $34) × 1.7 = $66
Direct labor cost per unit
= (X + $34) = $38.82
= $38.82 - $34
= $4.32
Direct labor hours per unit = Direct labor cost per unit ÷ Direct labor per hour cost
= $4.32 ÷ $28
= $0.15 hours per unit
Answer:
Cash flow year 0 (110,000)
or in other way to express it: a cashoutflow for $110,000
Explanation:
Initial net cahs outflow
this will be the acquisition of the machine cost plus the increase in the working capital for the company
machine cost: all cost necessary for acquire the machien and get it operational
supplier list price 85,000
installation cost <u> 15,000</u>
total cost 100,000
Increase in Working Capital Cost 10,000
As these are cost they are negative so we have a cashouflow
Total cashflow (110,000)
I believe that is an example of <span>disengagement theory.
</span><span>disengagement theory believe that a person will eventually disengage with his/her current social group as he/she got older.
This could happen either because that person already accomplish their final fulfillment in life or could no longer relate with the value that held by the current social group.</span>
I think it’s false because no one was buying anything during the depression
