This is true. Researchers suggest that ineffective reward and recognition strategies are factors responsible for the failures.
<h3>
What are global teams?</h3>
These are also referred to as the multinational teams. They are the specific type of team that is found in a workforce where the members may be people that are from different places.
By different places, we mean they are from different nations and their cultural backgrounds differ.
Read more on global teams here: brainly.com/question/5392895
Answer: Use of several factors instead of a single market index to explain the risk-return relationship
Explanation:
Arbitrage pricing theory (APT) is when the return on an asset is forecasted when the linear relationship which exist between the expected return of the asset and the macroeconomic variables are being considered.
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) helps in showing the relationship that take place between systematic risk and an asset expected return.
The feature of the general version of the arbitrage pricing theory (APT) that offers the greatest potential advantage over the simple CAPM is the use of several factors instead of a single market index to explain the risk-return relationship as it's more robust when compared to the CAPM.
Answer:
$960,000
Explanation:
$1,000 (Monthly income x 30%)
$1,000 (3200 x 30%)
= $960,000
Answer: The answers are provided below
Explanation:
There are several similarities between the project management processes which surround scrum to the traditional project management processes which surrounds a project life cycle such as Waterfall. When one looks at each iteration as a project, one will see that Scrum planning meeting will be identical to planning meeting of the traditional project.
The daily standups in scrum will resemble the monitoring and the controlling of traditional waterfall with the exception that in scrum, its team monitors itself. A sprint would be the execution stage while the sprint review will be like project closure lessons that are learned. Sprint can be seen as small waterfall model project.
However, the main difference is in the scrum's team mindset versus the team of the traditional project management. Also, the process of work defining as being completed is different for the teams. Lastly, the method used by the scrum team in its approaches to work, team collaboration, responsibility acceptance, tasks definition and accountability are different from the traditional project management team.
A hybrid approach will be sensible in a large organization which has pockets of power. This is true for large retails that have old legacy systems in which frequent deployments aren't possible.
This is true for systems in which, testing can't be automated due to the fact that automated testing is a vital part for success for large scrum projects. In such organizations, it is sensible to use scrum for the teams which are able to move to scrum and waterfall can be used for other parts of the organization.
