Answer:
I. The class methods and instance methods of one class may call the public class methods of another class using dot notation and referencing the name of the other class.
Explanation:
Private methods are being accessed from only within the class or scope specified. No other means of accessibility is possible, and even through inheritance. And instance methods can never call without using dot notation, any of the class method of the same class. Hence second and third options are not correct. And the class method and the instance methods of one class may call the public class methods of another class using the dot notation and referencing the name of the other class. Hence, the correct option is the first one.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to help ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance.
Answer:
on the first empty cell to the right of the last cell containing a value.
Explanation:
The AutoSum function in excel gives a shortcut path to taking the sum of numeric values in a row or column of data. The Autosum uses the sum function to take the addition of all the desired rows or columns values without needing to make a manual highlight of the data. To use AutoSum with a row of 4 values, the cursor must be placed immediately at the cell next 4th row cell containing a value. This is equivalent to the first empty cell to the right of the last cell containing a value, then autosum is clicked in the home tab and all 4 cells will be highlighted as it uses the sum function to calculate the sun of the 4 row values.
A belief is an attitude that something is the case, or that some proposition about the world is true.[1] In epistemology, philosophers use the term "belief" to refer to attitudes about the world which can be either true or false.[2] To believe something is to take it to be true; for instance, to believe that snow is white is comparable to accepting the truth of the proposition "snow is white". However, holding a belief does not require active introspection. For example, few carefully consider whether or not the sun will rise tomorrow, simply assuming that it will. Moreover, beliefs need not be occurrent (e.g. a person actively thinking "snow is white"), but can instead be dispositional (e.g. a person who if asked about the color of snow would assert "snow is white").[2]
There are various different ways that contemporary philosophers have tried to describe beliefs, including as representations of ways that the world could be (Jerry Fodor), as dispositions to act as if certain things are true (Roderick Chisholm), as interpretive schemes for making sense of someone's actions (Daniel Dennett and Donald Davidson), or as mental states that fill a particular function (Hilary Putnam).[2] Some have also attempted to offer significant revisions to our notion of belief, including eliminativists about belief who argue that there is no phenomenon in the natural world which corresponds to our folk psychological concept of belief (Paul Churchland) and formal epistemologists who aim to replace our bivalent notion of belief ("either we have a belief or we don't have a belief") with the more permissive, probabilistic notion of credence ("there is an entire spectrum of degrees of belief, not a simple dichotomy between belief and non-belief").[2][3]
Beliefs are the subject of various important philosophical debates. Notable examples include: "What is the rational way to revise one's beliefs when presented with various sorts of evidence?"; "Is the content of our beliefs entirely determined by our mental states, or do the relevant facts have any bearing on our beliefs (e.g. if I believe that I'm holding a glass of water, is the non-mental fact that water is H2O part of the content of that belief)?"; "How fine-grained or coarse-grained are our beliefs?"; and "Must it be possible for a belief to be expressible in language, or are there non-linguistic beliefs?".[2]
