5 days does it take to sell 640 cupcakes.
Given:
A bakery sells 4 dozen cupcakes every 3 hours.
If the bakery is open 8 hours each day.
4 dozen cupcakes = 4*12 cupcakes
= 48 cupcakes
48 cupcakes = 3 hours
divide by 3 on both sides
3hours/3 = 48/3 cupcakes
1 hour = 16 cupcakes
Number of cupcakes for 8 hours = 8 * 16 = 128 cupcakes.
128 cupcakes sells in one day.
To sell 640 cupcakes = 640/128
= 5 days.
Therefore 5 days does it take to sell 640 cupcakes.
Learn more about the bakery and cupcakes here:
brainly.com/question/14466478
#SPJ1
Answer:
m∠N = 32°
NQ = 106°
When finding inscribed angles like ∠N with the intercepted arc, the equation is ∠N=1/2MP. (Inscribed angles are always half the degree of the arc length.) Plug in the corresponding value to get ∠N=1/2(64) to get 32°. When finding the angle of the intercepted arc with inscribed angles like NQ, the equation is NQ=2(∠P). Plug in the corresponding value to get 2(53) to get 106°.
800 different sets of digits
Since the first digit is a factor of 20, the factors of 20 are 1,2,4,5,10,20. We only need the single digit factors which are 1,2,4 and 5. These 4 numbers can be permuted in 1 way for the first digit, so we have ⁴P₁.
For the second digit, we have 10 digits permuted in 1 way, ¹⁰P₁ and also for the third digit, we have 10 digits permuted in 1 way, ¹⁰P₁ and for the last digit, which is divisible by 5, it is either a 0 or 5, so we have two digits permuted in 1 way, ²P₁.
So, the number of different 4 digit number that Zara'2 4-digit PIN code could be is ⁴P₁ × ¹⁰P₁ × ¹⁰P₁ × ²P₁ = 4 × 10 × 10 × 2 = 800 different sets of digits
<em><u>The equation can be used to find the actual length of Gregory's room is:</u></em>
<em><u>Solution:</u></em>
Given that,
The scale that he uses is:
1 cm : 4 feet
On this drawing, the room is 3 cm long
Let "x" be the actual length of room
Therefore,
1 cm : 4 feet
3 cm : "x" feet
This forms a proportion. Therefore,
Therefore, Option C is correct
Given that,
Rob chose A as the correct answer. Which is,
But option A is wrong
So, Rob made a mistake in measuring the equivalent ratio, it should be
