What are the arguments that agree (i.e., support), and disagree (i.e., against) with the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that r
uled the First Amendment right to free speech was violated by the Federal Election Commission’s restrictions on campaign contributions by corporations and unions?
The mentioned decision was about whether the corporations and unions can or can not contribute financially to the campaigns of the politicians they want to support as long as the corporations themselves are independent of the campaigns.
One of the strongest disagreements to this was that this action was going to allow the corporations to flood selected politicians' campaigns with money, maybe corporations outside of US.
One of the arguments that agree with the decision was that the corporations also have a right of free speech including supporting their chosen political candidates even though corporations are not individual people.
Bibles and information could be massed produced and distributed to the people slowing the rebirth of knowledge and science Hope this helped and good luck
Karl Marx promoted the idea or the principle that by
pursuing your own self – interest in a free market, you would actually be
working for the common good. This principle is self – centered which means you
need to start with your self interest in order that the common good of the
society will be achieved.
