Answer:
The explanation including its given subject is listed throughout the subsection on descriptions elsewhere here.
Explanation:
- Different groups of individuals describe it in diverse situations. Not social scientists are perfectly willing to come up with a single definition. We would then legislate morality for everyone's reasons of course as a formally enforceable social agreement made between two individuals, main provisions on something like committed relations as well as trying to claim the union's preservation.
- They should perhaps take into account differences in building a positive concept, including whether a legitimate legislative partnership is required or whether upwards of two individuals can be actively engaged. Many differences throughout the understanding of marriage could include for certain if partners should be of opposite genders or about the same genders, as well as because one of the common stereotypes of marriage is understood today.
- As we sometimes conclude from Simmel's study, the forms of the traditional family in which everyone or one of several aspects are represented are diversified: nuclear, polygamy, extended communities, parents of almost the same ethnicity, single-parent, mixed families, etc.
- Sociologists become concerned with the relationships between some of the traditional societies since marriages become traditionally what creates a household, therefore families are perhaps the very most fundamental social component about which community is founded. Both the marriage as well as the family establish status structures that the community approves.
Political independence refers to a lack of allegiance to any one ideology or political party.
One way to strengthen democracy as a system is to address such conduct and its potential future mass expansion.
A fundamental structural and procedural adjustment will be made to the major participants in the democratic system, the parties, if the rise of the politically independent becomes a trend. They will be converted into political hubs for coming up with new ideas. They will evolve into data and marketing banks for public opinion, as well as labs for creating approaches for resolving socially relevant problems.
Democracy as a system of the sort that humanity has been accustomed to over the past 200 years will eventually change as a result of this.
A majority of politically independent voters, who will demand more meaning from party policies and real responsibility from elected officials, will replace cohorts of disciplined party members. Recalling unsuccessful politicians will become commonplace, and the frequency of national and municipal referendums will increase.
The parties might undergo such a metamorphosis, becoming open public forums for discourse and societal advancement.
The answer isn't B because they were colonized by the British, not the French, they definitely aren't communist, and they aren't non-industrialized either.
Therefore, the answer is A
