Answer:
The answers are <u>cognitive conflict</u> and <u>affective conflict</u>
Explanation:
In any organization, be it family, work, sports team, etc., conflict are very common. There are two main different types of conflict that can arise: Task-related, or cognitive conflict; and relationship, or affective conflict. Cognitive conflict generally refers to differences between how to best perform an activity, how to achieve a goal, or the best course of action. Affective conflict, on the other hand, refers to personal differences between the involved parties, which lead to negative emotional responses.
In your example, this can be seen very clearly: differences between you and the owner were over differences in judgement, but deteriorated to the point where they are more emotional and directed personally toward one another. It thus can be said that you initially experienced <u>cognitive conflict</u>, but now are experiencing <u>affective conflict</u>.
Answer:
Satisfying
Explanation:
While lawmakers might generally agree that a large infusion of public funds to the public education system along with a dramatic reform of the public structure would optimize the outcomes of student performance in public education in Texas, they may choose to continue making incremental increases in funding and tweak the funding structure during each session in a practice referred to as satisfying
Exuberant infants and alert, energetic adults are especially likely to show high levels of brain activity in the
"left frontal lobe."
The frontal lobes are found straightforwardly behind the forehead. The frontal lobes are the biggest flaps in the human cerebrum and they are likewise the most well-known area of damage in awful mind damage. The frontal lobes are critical for intentional development, expressive dialect and for overseeing larger amount official functions.The frontal lobes are viewed as our conduct and passionate control focus and home to our identity.
Douglass drew on the idea of natural rights and the natural law tradition in his argument against slavery.He had a firm faith in the progress of man, civilization, and Western Christendom; hence, he saw American slavery as a brutal backwardness that ran counter to the progress of history. Take care i hope that helps :p