![\bf \textit{vertical parabola vertex form with focus point distance} \\\\ 4p(y- k)=(x- h)^2 \qquad \begin{cases} \stackrel{vertex}{(h,k)}\qquad \stackrel{focus~point}{(h,k+p)}\qquad \stackrel{directrix}{y=k-p}\\\\ p=\textit{distance from vertex to }\\ \qquad \textit{ focus or directrix}\\\\ \stackrel{"p"~is~negative}{op ens~\cap}\qquad \stackrel{"p"~is~positive}{op ens~\cup} \end{cases} \\\\[-0.35em] \rule{34em}{0.25pt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Bvertical%20parabola%20vertex%20form%20with%20focus%20point%20distance%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%204p%28y-%20k%29%3D%28x-%20h%29%5E2%20%5Cqquad%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20%5Cstackrel%7Bvertex%7D%7B%28h%2Ck%29%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cstackrel%7Bfocus~point%7D%7B%28h%2Ck%2Bp%29%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cstackrel%7Bdirectrix%7D%7By%3Dk-p%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20p%3D%5Ctextit%7Bdistance%20from%20vertex%20to%20%7D%5C%5C%20%5Cqquad%20%5Ctextit%7B%20focus%20or%20directrix%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7B%22p%22~is~negative%7D%7Bop%20ens~%5Ccap%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cstackrel%7B%22p%22~is~positive%7D%7Bop%20ens~%5Ccup%7D%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20%5Crule%7B34em%7D%7B0.25pt%7D)
something noteworthy is that the squared variable is the "x", thus the parabola is a vertical one, the "p" value is negative, so is opening downwards, and the h,k is pretty much the origin,
vertex is at (0,0)
the focus point is "p" or 5 units down from there, namely at (0, -5)
the directrix is "p" units on the opposite direction, up, namely at y = 5
the focal width, well, |4p| is pretty much the focal width, in this case, is simply yeap, you guessed it, 20.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
Changing the division to multiplication by taking the reciprocal of the second fraction.
<u>The correct option is C</u>
i would say B
when it says "the measure", it's refering to where the second quartile is beginning
Rotation of triangle JKL by 180 degrees will result in a triangle with corresponding vertices of (2, 4), (3, 2) and (-1, 2).
Then translating the resulting triangle 2 units up will result in a triangle with corresponding vertices (4, -2), (2, -3) and (2, 1) which is the same triangle as the given triangle MNP.
Therefore, the statement that best explains whether △JKL is congruent to △MNP is △JKL is congruent to △MNP because △JKL can be mapped to △MNP by a
rotation of 180° about the origin followed by a translation 2 units up.
Answer:
x=-3.5 or -7/2 (same thing)
y=21/5
Step-by-step explanation:
x intercept is when y=0
y intercept is when x=0
so
x intercept is
-6x=21
x=21/-6
x=-3.5
y intercept is
5y=21
y=21/5
