Both options A and B are present in the idea exposed in <em>The Anti-Suffragist </em>by William Lloyd. But, when it comes to this specific passage, the answer that seems to be correct is B. show that objections to suffrage are based upon stereotypical assumptions about women.
This passage is about the misconception that women would rather worry - only - about domestic affairs and leave the thinking to men, since it is a hard task.
The woman characterized in this poem, Remonstra, ends up proving the exact opposite, however. She works so hard fighting against the suffrage, organizing speeches and committees, that everyone else admires her intelligence and abilities. People even say she would be better at running a city than half the men in office. The stereotype she is fighting so diligently to maintain is, thus, destroyed.
Answer:
to show his true strength that the weapon was only that a sword
Explanation:
Flashbacks in fiction are simply scenes from the past. If a story begins at Point A and finishes some time later at Point Z, a flashback is a scene that happened before Point A, usually many years before.
Notice the word scene. In exposition, you tell the readers something about a fictional character’s past. But in flashbacks, you show them in the form of a fully dramatized scene.
Do you need to use flashbacks in a novel?
Absolutely not. In fact, if you can tell the story without them then so much the better.
You see, what the readers are really interested in is the present story (which runs between points A and Z). Anything which interferes with this is a distraction.
So if the episode from a character’s past can be told in a few lines of exposition (telling it, not showing it) then that is what you should do.
If you have no option but to use dramatized flashbacks in your fiction, here are three things you must do…
Explanation:
