The answers are: It does not allow listeners to interpret each character through his or her tone; and it does not allow listeners to review or reread what each character has said.
When hearing the characters voices out loud, and in the hypothetical case that it is a live audition and not a recording, one, as part of the audience, does not have, evidently, the possibility of reviewing or rereading what each character says. This may seem vane, but in reality, it can be very important when reading since sometimes the sense of what´s being read is so profound that, in order to capture in full, one needs to review a certain passage.
Also, hearing the characters has the disadvantage of making their voices concrete and specific according to whoever is speaking. This leaves out the possibility of filling the character´s voice with one´s own imagination, wit, and fantasy, which usually are very important characteristics of a fictional character (literature, in the end, is always a very subjective activity on the side of the reader).
Answer: English for Specific Purposes
Explanation: English for Specific Purposes usually focuses on teaching people who are at a university level or who have a job, in order to obtain an English learning applied to their area. Depending on the profession or interest, English teaching will focus specifically on working in one of these areas. This type of teaching is very beneficial for their learning since they will learn based on their goals.
After reading both texts, we can see that the authors mostly share their opinions about the San Diego Zoo, but that Text 1 author prefers capybaras.
- Zoos provide people with important information about animals. - Both authors.
- The San Diego Zoo is a great place for animals to live. - Both authors.
- The best animal to see at the zoo is the capybara. - Text 1 author.
<h3>What are the authors' opinions?</h3>
After reading both Text 1 and Text 2, we can see that the two authors like the San Diego Zoo. One goes there as a visitor, the other works there. Both speak of how the zoo provides important information about the animals. And both mention that the zoo provides a good habitat for the animals. However, Text 1 author focuses on capybaras, whereas Text 2 author speaks more generally.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude the author who would agree with each opinion is the following:
- Zoos provide people with important information about animals. - Both authors.
- The San Diego Zoo is a great place for animals to live. - Both authors.
- The best animal to see at the zoo is the capybara. - Text 1 author.
Learn more about author's opinions here:
brainly.com/question/17447794
#SPJ1
Answer:
exclamatory sentence in my sense
