The Supreme Court said Mr. Reynolds could not break the law while practicing his religion.
Reynolds v. the United States was heard by the Supreme Court in 1878 in regard the Morrill Anti-Bigamy Act placed on the Utah Territory.
Reynolds argued that preventing him to marry more than one woman was a violation of his First Amendment rights to protection of religion. The Supreme Court concluded that he had the right to his belief but he could not go around the law to practice his faith. The law stated marriage was to be between two people only and therefore he could not be married to more than one woman.
He argued that the essential natural (human) right was “to use his own power, as he will himself for the preservation of his own Nature that is to say of his own Life"
Sara Estela Ramírez used her poetry to communicate her political beliefs. Write a short poem that expresses how you feel about one of the most pressing social or political issues facing people today.