Compared to a purely competitive firm in long-run equilibrium, the monopolistic competitor has a higher price and lower output.
<h3>
When a monopolistic competitive firm is in long-run equilibrium?</h3>
Long Run Monopolistic Competition Equilibrium: Over the long run, a company in a market with the monopolistic competition will produce several items at the point where the long-run marginal cost (LRMC) curve crosses the marginal revenue curve (MR). Where the quantity produced lies on the average revenue (AR) curve will determine the pricing.
<h3>
What ultimately transpires to a monopolistic rival?</h3>
Long-term economic gains or losses in monopolistic competition will be removed by entry or leave, leaving firms with no economic gains. There will be some excess capacity in a monopolistically competitive business; this could be seen as the price paid for the variety of products that this market structure brings about.
Learn more about monopolistic competition: brainly.com/question/28189773
#SPJ4
Answer:
Jan .7 Dr Vacation Benefits Expense $ 160
Cr To Vacation Benefits Payable $160
Explanation:
Journal entry for Mayer
Date Account Name Debit Credit
Jan .7
Dr Vacation Benefits Expense $ 160
Cr To Vacation Benefits Payable $160
( to record vacation pay expense.)
Answer:
Short run aggregate supply curve is flat ( A )
Explanation:
The special case of the AS-AD following the IS-LM is that the short run aggregate supply curve is flat
This is because in an AS-AD model the price level is constant and AD represents an equilibrium point along IS-LM model, hence the price been constant, shows that in short run aggregate supply curve will be flat.
A market product growth strategy focuses on increasing sales of the firm's current products to its current target markets.
A product growth strategy increases sales looking all the prospects of the department rather than focus on only one department of the firm. It develops the firms production process in all aspects.
The strategy is made and planned according to the current market conditions to achieve its desired targets and get the maximum profit out of the production process that is taking place in the firm which in turn increase sales of the firm by increasing consumers demand.
To learn more about product growth strategy here,
brainly.com/question/13362867
#SPJ4
Answer:
This case has similarities to the instances of Cesarini v. the US, 296 F.Supp. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1969), is a noteworthy case decided by the U.S. Locale Court for the Northern District of Ohio, where the court decided that treasure trove property is remembered for net salary for the assessment year when it was found.
A. TAX RESEARCH ISSUES :
1. Regardless of whether charges on the monies were due in the year the piano was bought or in the year the monies were found?
2. Regardless of whether the monies found in the piano are includable as gross income of the parties?
3. Regardless of whether offended parties are qualified for capital gains treatment?
B. Keywords:
- Monies found
- Cesarini v. United States
- Treasure
- Piano
- 26 U.S. Code § 102
- Gross Income
- Gift
