Answer D is the correct answer
Eisenhower's position did not depart from those programs to any large degree. Eisenhower's position essentially was not to dismantle what had been done, but going forward, not to introduce further expansive or experimental programs. Eisenhower wanted government to operate in a manageable, responsible way. He vetoed some proposals that would have represented large new expenditures for things of uncertain value, such as a a bill to provide federal assistance funds to depressed areas of the country. At the same time, however, he did pursue national public works projects like the Interstate Highway System which were an extension of the kind of public works measures that had been part of previous administrations. Eisenhower realized that longstanding social policies like Social Security were here to stay as part of the fabric of American life and government.
<span>The real ideas and beliefs that led to the genocide was the revolutionary nationalist flows that go all-out for the establishment of what they call Turkey for Turks in which all the non-Muslim and non-Turkish most especially those who have their own cultural identity likely Armenians, Syrians, Chaldeans and Greeks who had a solid background and history in the state couldn’t be fit in and thus must be physically eliminated. </span>
Well, as a obvious answer, I would have to say that they were at least both Kings in the same era.