<h2>A $4.00 for car wash is good</h2>
Explanation:
Option A: A fancy hair cut option is given but it is not associated with any of the price. So we cannot say it is good or worth for the money.
Option B: It seems to be valid. But when we consider all the given options, there are better options than this.
Option C: Rusted means a brown layer formed on the body of the car. So we cannot say it is good. So this option too is invalid.
Option D: Normally car wash costs $10. It is worth to do a complete car wash with $4.00. This option is the best choice.
Answer: Winona has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the opportunity cost will be calculated as:
= Earnings per hour × Hours taken to complete the task
Therefore, for Winona, the opportunity cost will be:
= 1 × $200.
= $200.
For Hubert, the opportunity cost will be:
= 9 × $25
= $225
Therefore, based on the calculation above, Winona has the lowest opportunity cost of completing the task.
The rise of the car culture led to the spread of fast-food restaurants and drive-in movie theaters based on the choices from the question above. The "the spread of fast-food restaurants and drive-in movie theaters" is the most suitable answer<span>. Because only this sentence has the relation with the car culture.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is D
Explanation:
The compensatory stock option is the option which is given or provided to the employee, providing the ability for purchasing the certain number of the shares of the company at the price which is the pre- determined one along with the pre- determined range of the date.
And the stock options which have the outstanding account that should be decreased or reduced at the date of exercise.
Answer:
Option B
Cost of goods reported =$ 125,000
Explanation:
<em>Overheads are charged to units produced by the means of using an estimated overhead absorption rate. This rate is computed using budgeted overhead and budgeted activity level.
</em>
As a result of this, overhead charged to total units product might be over or under absorbed compared to the actual amount incurred.
<em>The under applied overhead implies that the applied overhead is less than the actual overhead. </em>
This implies that the cost of the goods are under valued. Hence, to accurately valued them, the under applied overhead would be added to the cost of the goods.
Cost of goods reported = cost of goods + under applied overhead
= 120,000 + 5,000 = 125,000
Cost of goods reported =$ 125,000
