Answer: false
Explanation:
The statement is false because cost leadership is not really sustainable as it's cost effective due to the maintenance charge required to keep them in a great care despite the low operational cost being runned by the organization
A witness testimony would be direct evidence. Hope you found that helpful :)
Answer:
The $20 ticket to the match.
Explanation:
The sunk cost would be the $20 ticket to the match.
Answer:
1. a. Callie =$375,000
b. Neil $25,000
2. Equal
Explanation:
The computation of given question is shown below:-
1. Adjusted Callie contribution = $300,000
Neil contribution = $100,000 × 50%
= $75,000
Callie basis in partnership interest after the formation = $300,000 + $75,000
= $375,000
Adjusted Neil contribution = $100,000
Neil contribution = $100,000 × 50%
= $75,000
Neil basis in partnership interest after the formation = $375,000 - $75,000
= $25,000
2. Equal or in Profit-Loss Sharing Ratio
In the profit - loss sharing ratio or equal when debt is allocated between the two partners
I believe the answer you are looking for is open seating arrangement - nobody has assigned seats and people can move around freely to interact with whoever they like. This improves collaboration and communication among the people in the meeting.
