1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mel-nik [20]
3 years ago
11

Which statement is true of tropical rainforests?

Biology
1 answer:
konstantin123 [22]3 years ago
3 0
A should be the answer 
You might be interested in
Describe Two primary fuctions of the cell membrane
geniusboy [140]
Controls what substances can move in and out of the cell. it also protects the cell from its surroundings.
4 0
2 years ago
Why is the defense attempting to exclude OJ’s domestic Violence history from the court case?
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

The celebrity of the defendant, the other major players, and the case itself had, and continues to have, society as a whole discussing domestic violence and the effectiveness of our laws that deal with this area of criminal law. Since the commission of the crimes in June of 1994, the Simpson' case brought to the forefront the issue of what role evidence of prior domestic violence should play in criminal prosecutions. In addition to the forensic evidence which the Los Angeles prosecutors relied upon to attempt to convict Mr. Simpson, the theory of the prosecution's case rested on the proposition that Mr. Simpson committed the murders against his former wife, Nicole Brown Simpson (hereinafter Ms. Brown), and her friend, Ronald Goldman, because of jealousy, obsession, and the need to dominate Ms. Brown. The prosecution's case rested entirely upon circumstantial evidence, and as such, the prosecutors sought to introduce evidence of Mr. Simpson's past abusive conduct toward Ms. Brown to establish the identity of the perpetrator and his motives to commit the brutal crimes. The prosecution argued that the history of domestic violence and prior threats were probative evidence of Mr. Simpson's motive, intent, plan, and identity as the killer. According to Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti, the trial judge's ruling on the admissibility of this evidence was the "most critical ruling" that the Court would make in the case The prior conduct which the prosecution wanted to introduce on its direct case included acts of physical beatings upon Ms. Brown by Mr. Simpson, some of which were documented by photographs showing Ms. Brown's injuries. Other incidents included an episode in which Mr. Simpson had thrown Ms. Brown out of a moving car; a 1989 assault for which Ms. Brown had been hospitalized due to her injuries; Mr. Simpson's 1989 no contest plea to spousal abuse for which he was ordered to undergo counseling and pay a fine; letters of apology for the abuse written by Mr. Simpson to Ms. Brown; Mr. Simpson's repeated threats to kill Ms. Brown; a 1993 recording of a "911" telephone call made by Ms. Brown to the police, during which the voice of Mr. Simpson was heard making threats and shouting obscenities at Ms. Brown; evidence that Mr. Simpson was stalking Ms. Brown, and that shortly before her death, Ms. Brown had made contact with a battered women's shelter help-line; and many other instances of actual and threatened violence committed by Mr. Simpson against Ms. Brown dating back to 1977. In January 1995, Judge Lance Ito, who presided over the murder trial, ruled that much of the domestic violence history would be admissible on the prosecution's direct case, including the 1993 "911" tape-recorded telephone call by Ms. Brown. The evidence was admitted to provide the jury with an appreciation of the "nature and quality" of the relationship between Mr. Simpson anji Ms. Brown, and to aid in establishing motive, intent, plan, and identity of the killer.

3 0
3 years ago
Jim and tom are trying to determine whether their ideas are scientific or pseudoscientific. Jim's idea is non-testable, and Tom'
vlabodo [156]
Only toms idea could be scientific since it is testable, can be tested by others, have a hypothesis, and be proven
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How are the diverse living organisms within a biome dependent upon each other and the nonliving parts of their environment? Give
Basile [38]
An example that shows how organisms are dependent on each other would using a food chain as an example.
• mouse eat grass and drink water ( which is nonliving)
• mouse gets eaten by fox
• then fox then eaten by coyote and the cycle continues
However is one of these organisms have low population it will be difficult for the others. For example if there is a low population of coyotes then the fox population over populate same goes for if fox are low in population then the mouses become over populated hence diseases could spread from the mouses. The organisms must keep each other in check
7 0
3 years ago
Ecology is the study of ?
Katen [24]

Answer:

Ecology is the study of ecosystems.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ATP is the nucleic acid that
    6·1 answer
  • Dna ligase is an enzyme that joins together pieces of dna. true false
    11·1 answer
  • Process in which chemical energy, instead of sunlight, is used to make "food"
    8·1 answer
  • Information from various sources may be used when writing a lab report. Which of these sources must be cited in the References s
    8·1 answer
  • A scientist engineers a virus that contains the gene thought to provide bacterial resistance to the antibiotic vancomycin. The s
    15·1 answer
  • If a strand of DNA has 24% T, what percent will be G?
    11·2 answers
  • What super hero had a change or mutation occur in their DNA that gave them their super power?
    11·2 answers
  • Why do concentration gradients exist?
    13·1 answer
  • Paving land within a watershed will likely-
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Avery experiment expand on Frederick Griffith's observations?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!