It is like Nixon said, "no event in American history is more misunderstood than the Vietnam War." I can't give a clear answer but I do have some food for thought which may paint a big picture.
1. You have to keep in mind that Vietnam was not about who killed more troops.
If the winner of the Vietnam war was declared by who killed more troops than the U.S. would win hands down. The U.S. casualties were roughly half a million, where as the Vietcong suffered a little more than a million. Then how did we lose?
2. Keep in mind that at this time technology has improved and Vietnam is the first war where people are watching it go on right at home on there television screen.
They are seeing their sons being shot and viewing dead soldiers every single day.
You did not see this in WW1 or WW2 or the Korena War.
Answer:
Mutually Assured Destruction, or mutually assured deterrence (MAD), is a military theory that was developed to deter the use of nuclear weapons. ... To many, mutually assured destruction helped prevent the Cold War from turning hot; to others, it is the most ludicrous theory humanity ever put into full-scale practice.
The philosophers of the Enlightenment hoped to improve human society by <span>using reason to solve human problems. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a". I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your help.</span>
Hey! :)
A Forum<span> was the main center of a </span>Roman<span> city. Usually located near the physical center of a </span>Roman<span> town, it served as a public area in which commercial, religious, economic, political, legal, and social </span>activities<span> occurred. Fora were common in all </span>Roman<span> cities, but none were as grand as the fora of </span>Rome<span> itself.
</span>
Hope this helps! :)
