Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
The more education a person has, the more likely that they are to be valuable to their owners,because they would be considered "smarter" than their peers and able to get more work done. This means that answer to the question is A. Education may make a worker more valuable to employers.
HOPE THIS HELPS ; GOOD LUCK <3 !!!!
Answer:
1)
cost of making (14000*22) = 308000
cost of buying (14000*(18+6)) = 336000
Difference cost = 28000
2)
No, Since, there is not other use of fixed cost, therefore, fixed cost will be a part of cost of buying.
3-a)
cost of making (14000*22) = 308000
cost of buying (14000*18) = 252000
3-b)
Yes, Since, there is other use of fixed cost, therefore, fixed cost will not be a part of cost of buying.
