Answer: option 3
Explanation:
Background to the case:
The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of many issues, most centering around the use by Ford of a cost-benefit analysis and the ethics surrounding its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis.
Basis of analysis:
Should a risk/benefit analysis be used in situations where a defect in manufacturing could lead to seriously bodily harm and even worse death, such as in the Ford Pinto situation?
Rule of the court:
There hasn’t really been a definite decision about the case and arguments both for and against such an analysis have been made. It is an economically efficient method which has been accepted by courts for numerous years, however, juries may not always agree, so companies should take this into account.
Discretion is expected to be used.
Answer:
selling an investment for more than they paid for it
Hope this helps plz mark me brainliest
Answer:
The correct answer is option (C).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Base year basket price = $5,000 billion
Year 2 basket price = $5,500 billion
So, we can calculate the consumer price index by using following formula:
Consumer price index = (Year 2 basket price ÷ Base year basket price ) × 100
By putting the value, we get
Consumer price index = ( $5,500 ÷ $5,000 ) × 100
= 1.1 × 100
= $110 billion
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
