1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lbvjy [14]
3 years ago
13

Why do governments have stricter rules about decision-making than private organizations do?

History
1 answer:
True [87]3 years ago
7 0

Governments are supposed to have limited power because they are meant to serve the people, not the other way around.

Considering that, having stricter rules mean that the rules won't jut "do what they want" when in power.

Having strict rules and strict functions to each statesmen means that they are more likely to do what they are meant to instead of turning the power of the government against the people.

You might be interested in
Would you call yourself a “progressive”? Why or why not? Explain
poizon [28]

Answer:

It helps people know if you are a professional and people might think your company is a really good company.

Explanation:

can't think of one sorry

4 0
3 years ago
How long after Jerusalem's walls were breached did Jerusalem fall to the Babylonians.
Elena L [17]
It took about Thirty Days.
8 0
3 years ago
What is the worship of many gods
Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

Polytheistic/Polytheism

3 0
3 years ago
Why did Musa make a pilgrimage to Mecca?
sveta [45]

Answer:

He was determined to travel not only for his own religious fulfillment but also for recruiting teachers and leaders so that his realms could learn more of the Prophet's teachings. Musa was a devout Muslim, and his pilgrimage to Mecca made him well known across northern Africa and the Middle East.Kingdom: Mali Empire

Children: Mansa Maghan, Maghan I

Sibling: Mansa Suleyman

Nationality: Mali

Explanation:

hope it helps

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What helped to propel the decision by American Leaders to drop the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Dennis_Churaev [7]

The correct answer is - D. It was widely agreed that a traditional invasion of Japan would drag the war on for years and lead to may, may more deaths than the atomic bomb.

The US officials decided to use the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan because of two reasons. The first and more important one was to put an end to the war as quickly and efficiently as possible, minimizing the deaths of their troops as much as possible. The second one was to create an image of a country that reached a level of global military power, in order to boost its global reputation and cause fear at other nations.

Both of those things worked out very fine for the USA. They ended the war with Japan in no time, and they gained a status of a global military powerhouse.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In the year 3000, what would be the human population be?
    15·1 answer
  • Why does Paine begin his argument for independence with an attack on the principle of monarchy and hereditary succession?
    7·2 answers
  • Describe how the entry of united states into the war was a turning point
    5·1 answer
  • The lapita has a very distinctive type of?
    6·2 answers
  • NEED HELP IMMEDIATELY
    11·2 answers
  • I will give brainliest
    7·1 answer
  • on the witness stand, what does superintendent springer say is the reason for segregation in Clarendon?
    13·1 answer
  • What is shown in this picture?
    5·1 answer
  • How did explorers help america become the country it is today PLSSSSS HELP ME :(
    14·2 answers
  • 4. How did wise rule make the Roman Empire very powerful? Use the word emperor in your
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!