Answer:
<h2>The accounting scandals of the early 2000s</h2>
led many people to question the legitimacy of:
allowing an accounting firm to do both consulting and auditing work for the same company.
Explanation:
1) Enron and WorldCom fell from grace during the scandal. And Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 was introduced to regulate the practise of auditing, which was before self-regulated.
2) People felt that accounting firms were getting so much revenue from consulting that they did not pay much attention to their auditing work.
3) They also felt that the consulting relationship was jeopardizing their responsibilities and commitments as independent auditors.
4) Since they were involved in consulting and offering management services, they paid a lip service to their main responsibilities and directly compromised their positions as verifiers of the truth and fairness in the presentation of financial statements.
5) According to Paul Krugman of The New York Times, “the Enron debacle is not just the story of a company that failed; it is the story of a system that failed. And the system didn’t fail through carelessness or laziness; it was corrupted.” People felt that the corruption arose from the performance of these separate services by the same auditing personnel and firm.
Answer:
16 points
Explanation:
Customer sold stock short for $82 per share
Then, customer sold Sept 70 at $4
If short put is then exercised, the customer is obligated to buy the shares back at $70.
Net cost of the customer is $66 per share for the stock, therefore
Customer gains = 82 sale proceeds - 66 cost basis = 16 points.
Answer:
A & C are correct
Explanation:
Payback period is a capital budgeting technique used to determine the number of years it would take a project cash inflows to fully recover the initial amount invested. Since it involves basic addition of subsequent expected cash inflows to determine at what point in time the balance changes from negative to positive ,regular payback period does not take into account the time value of money.
Additionally, payback period determination ignores future cashflows after the balance has changed from negative to positive. Due to this reason, it does not take into account the project's entire life.
Answer:
Explanation:
1.
Petty Cash (200-50.6) Dr.$149.4
Cash Cr.$149.4
Freight In Dr. $58.4
Postage Dr.$40
Balloons Expense Dr.$20
Meals Expense Dr.$25
Cash Cr.$143.4
2. Petty Cash Dr.$50
Bank/Cash Cr.$50
To record final annual interest and bond repayment:
2017
Mar 1
Bonds interest expense $25,400
Bonds payable $254,000
Cash $279,000
On March 1, 1997, the date of issuance, the entry is:
1997
Mar 1
Cash $254,000
Bonds payable $254,000
On each March 1 for 10 years, beginning March 1, 1997 (ending March 1, 2017), the entry would be (Remember, calculate interest as Principal x Interest Rate x Time)
Mar 1
Bond Interest Expense ($100,000 x 12% x 1) $25,400
Cash $25,400