All categories

4 years ago

The price of an air conditioner was reduced from rs 27000 to rs 24000 find the rate of percentage

2 answers:

5 0

3000 because the rate of change is from 27000 to 24000 so that's the rate of change but I have no idea what the percentage rate of change is omega lul

makkiz [27]4 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The percentage decrease in price of Air conditioner is 33.33%

Step-by-step explanation:

Given as :

The initial price of air conditioner = Rs 27000

The reduce price of air conditioner = Rs 24000

Let the rate of percentage = x %

So, % decrease = $\frac{\textrm initial value - \textrm final value}{\textrm initial value}$ × 100

Or, % decrease = $\frac{\textrm 27000 - \textrm 24000}{\textrm 27000}$ × 100

Or , % decrease = $\frac{3000}{27000}$ × 100

Or, % decrease = $\frac{100}{9}$

Or. % decrease = 33.33 %

Hence The percentage decrease in price of Air conditioner is 33.33% Answer

You might be interested in

A is directly proportional to b, and a = 14 when b = 42. Write a direct

Natali [406]

Answer:

a is to be as b as 1 is to 3 (a:b as 1:3)

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Ben and irie made a secret code. they wrote some numbers of the code so they could remember the pattern. what should the next nu

stiks02 [169]

Well what was the pattern they had

4 0

3 years ago

A teacher was interested in finding out whether a special study program would increase the scores of students on a national exam

bija089 [108]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

Going by the first attached image below we reject H_o against H_1 if obs. $T > t_{\alpha /2;n-1}$

here obs.T=1.879

$\therefore obs.T \ngtr 2.447=t_{0.025;6}$

we accept $H_o:\mu _{1}=\mu_{2}$ at 5% level of significance.

i.e there is no sufficient evidence to indicate that the special study program is more effective at 5% level of significance.

this problem is simillar to the previous one except the alternative hypothesis.

Let X_i's denote the bonuses given by female managers and Y_i's denote the bonuses given by male managers.

we assume that $X_i \sim N(\mu _{1},\sigma _{1}^{2}) Y_i \sim N(\mu _{2},\sigma _{2}^{2})$ independently

We want to test $H_0:\mu_{1}=\mu_{2} vs H_1:\mu_{1}\neq \mu_{2}$

define $D_i=X_i-Y_i , i=1(1)8$

now $D_i\sim N(\mu _{1}-\mu _{2}=\mu _{D},\sigma _{1}^{2}+\sigma _{2}^{2}=\sigma _{D}^{2}) , i=1(1)8$

the hypothesis becomes

$H_0:\mu_{D}=0 vs H_1:\mu_{D}\neq 0$

in the third attached image, we use the same test statistic as before

i.e at 5% level of significance there is not enough evidence to indicate a difference in average bonuses .

3 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me pls

Crank

Answer:

figure it out

Step-by-step explanation:

yeeeeet

7 0

3 years ago

Hey you click and answer :}

Contact [7]

Answer:

Hey :)

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago