Answer:
The correct option is B
Explanation:
In order to compute the profit, the accountant consider the Explicit cost so,
Explicit Cost = Borrowed amount × Interest rate + Ingredients amount
= $30,000 × 3% + $25,000
= $259,000
Where Revenue is $60,000
Profit = Revenue - Explicit Cost
= $60,000 - $259,000
= $34,100
Economic Profit is computed as:
Economic Profit = Total Profit - Implicit Cost
= $34,100 - $40,600
= - $6,500
where
Implicit Cost = Salary + Interest
= $40,000 + ($20,000 × 3%)
= $40,000 + $600
= $40,600
Therefore, Louis says profit is $34,100 and Greg says she lost $6,500
Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
Wages in one industry or another will depend on the labor demand and the specialization required for the job. Auto manufacturing technician job positions are demanded in higher quantities than aircraft manufacturing mechanics. The reason is that aircraft traffic is not even close to the automobile traffic level. Thus, <em>as more auto technicians are requested, their wages tend to be lower</em>. Besides, <em>as fewer aircraft technicians are requested, their wages tend to be higher</em>.
Answer:
e. $6,000 preferred; $0 common.
Explanation:
The Preference Stock holders hold first preference during payment of dividends followed by the Common Stockholders.
Note also that Cumulative Preference Stock can have their dividends accumulated and paid in the latter years when funds become available.
Amount of Preference Stock dividend is fixed and calculated as follows:
9,450 shares × $10 × 5% = $ 4,725
2015
Cash dividends = $0
Preference Stock dividend Paid = $0
Preference Stock dividend Arrears = $ 4,725
No Common Stock Dividend
2016
Cash dividends = $6,000
Preference Stock dividend Paid = $6,000
Preference Stock dividend Arrears = $ 3,450
No Common Stock Dividend
784.967 rounded to the nearest whole number is 785
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Ricci v. DeStefano, the Supreme Court ruled that an employer may not simply disregard a test based on unwanted results unless the test is shown to be biased or deficient.
Explanation:
Ricci v. DeStefano is a Supreme Court ruling of 2009, after a lawsuit by nineteen firefighters who claimed to have been discriminated against in terms of career development. They denounced that they had been discriminated after having passed the admission tests and still had not been promoted, since no African-American candidate had passed the tests. They also denounced that they had not been promoted because the Fire Department did not want to promote a group of new recruits without including within it any member of racial minorities.
Finally, the Supreme Court established that said procedure violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, since in the case equal access to employment was not guaranteed (in this case, favoring minorities over white firefighters), for set different demands for purely racial reasons.
