Answer:
-Better decision making
-Can prevent costly mistakes and helps in tax period
"30" is the answer you're looking for.
The work breakdown structure must be the basis for a project cost estimate if you plan to create a cost baseline and use earned value management as part of monitoring and controlling costs.
Work can be made more manageable and approachable by using a common productivity strategy called task breaking. The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), one of the most significant projects management papers, is the tool that applies this technique to projects. It does it on its own, integrating scope, cost, and schedule baselines to guarantee project plans are in sync.
The Work Breakdown Structure is a "deliverable-oriented hierarchical decomposition of the work to be completed by the project team," according to the PMI Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK). WBS can be divided into two categories: deliverable-based and phase-based. The deliverable-based strategy is the most popular and preferred method. The Elements listed in the first Level of the WBS are the primary distinction between the two methodologies.
Learn more about project costs here brainly.com/question/15518327
#SPJ4
<span>As there is no set of options given with the question, we'd go with one difference which is most conspicuous between the two types of countries. That difference is the standard of living and amenities in the incone range of the masses. In developing countries, people still have to give up on necessary amenities which are normal to have in developed countries.</span>
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
Given the following;
Standard hours per unit of output 6.4 hours
Standard variable overhead rate $12.80 per hour
Actual hours 2,650 hours
Actual output 150 units
To calculate the variable overhead efficiency variance, we will use the formula below;
Variable overhead efficiency variance
= (Standard quantity - Actual quantity) × Standard rate
Standard quantity = 150 units × 6.4 = 960
Variable overhead efficiency variance
= (960 - 2,650) × $12.80
= $21,632 unfavourable
