Answer:
The correct answer to the statement: A secondary source is not useful and should not be used for academic purposes, would be: false.
Explanation:
When doing research, and writing an academic paper, one thing that is vital to the validity and veracity of the document is where the researcher draws its information from: direct, or primary sources like letters, journals, or sources that inform about an even in that very moment, or secondary sources. These sources are usually books, dictionaries, and others, that have been written after an event has happened, and thus are not directly narrating the event. However, these are very important source of information to use in research because they provide further insight, expert opinion, expert analysis, and other things, on a topic, and enrich it, giving it further validity. This is why saying that they are not useful and should not be used in academic purposes is wrong.
