Answer:
an overall low-cost provider strategy.
Explanation:
Competitive advantage can be defined as conditions, factors or circumstances that allow a business firm (organization) to manufacture finished goods or services better and perhaps cheaper than other (rival) firms in the same industry. Thus, it's responsible for putting a business firm in a superior or more favorable position than rival firms.
This ultimately implies that, a competitive advantage has a significant impact on a business because it increases its level of sales, revenue generation and profit margin when compared to rival firms in the same industry.
A overall low-cost provider strategy is a strategic business model that's typically focused on a broad customer base (segment) while still making profit by providing low-cost goods and services to the customers, as well as underpricing rivals in the same industry.
This ultimately implies that, it is a business strategy that involves lowering the price of goods and services in order to stimulate demand, generate more revenue, draw more customers and gain a competitive advantage over competitors or rivals in the same industry.
Hence, when a company strives to achieve lower overall costs than its rivals in the same industry and appeals to a broad spectrum of customers, it is considered to pursue an overall low-cost provider strategy.
The answer is A, occur when a taxpayer's income tax withholding exceeds what they owe.
Answer: D. schedule of accounts payable
Explanation: The schedule of accounts payable is a list of all vendors which includes their names, amount payable and due date.
It is also a schedule detailed from the account payable ledger.
Answer:
Net income of the company accounted for $400,000
Explanation:
Net income is the income or the amount of residual income from the earnings after deducting all the expense or cost from the sales.
The net income or loss of the company accounted for is computed as:
Net Income or Loss = Net Income - Research and Development cost
where
Net Income amounts to $3,400,000
Research and Development cost amounts to $3,000,000
So, putting the values above:
Net Income or loss = $3,400,000 - $3,000,000
Net Income = $400,000
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
