a list of potential customers for your new product would be created using accounting
Answer: Each Nash equilibrium is a subgame perfect equilibrium.
Explanation:
The Nash Equilibrium in a game is the outcome of which neither of the players would want to deviate from because they are making the highest payoff that they can given the other player's possible choice and leaving this outcome would result in a lower payoff.
In every subgame that is based on the original game therefore, the Nash equilibrium represents the perfect equilibrium for the players as it is giving the highest payoff given the circumstances.
Answer: No, because all of the defendant's facilities and offices are in State A.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, a federal district court cannot have subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's action.
In this case, there's no subject matter jurisdiction by the court as theres subject matter jurisdiction when there is full diversity of citizenship, and the amount of controversy is more tha $75,000.
I think the answer might be called Vertical Integration
Answer:
Market rate of return on stock = 11.2152%
Explanation:
Details provided are
Market rate per share = $27.21
Dividend to be paid at year end = $1.80
Expected dividend growth rate = 4.6%
Expected return of market has to be calculated.
Using the dividend growth model we have,
![Price\ of\ share\ = \frac{Dividend\ at\ year\ end}{Market\ return\ - Growth\ rate}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Price%5C%20of%5C%20share%5C%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7BDividend%5C%20at%5C%20year%5C%20end%7D%7BMarket%5C%20return%5C%20-%20Growth%5C%20rate%7D)
![27.21 = \frac{1.80}{Rm - 4.6}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=27.21%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1.80%7D%7BRm%20-%204.6%7D)
Market return - growth = ![\frac{1.8}{27.21} = 6.6152](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1.8%7D%7B27.21%7D%20%3D%206.6152)
Market return = 6.6152 + 4.6 = 11.2152%
Market rate of return on stock = 11.2152%