Answer:
Increase of he cost of living VS stagnaition of income
Explanation:
Having a fixed income that is not adjusted by inflation affects the quality of living as year by year the cost of goods and services will rise but the income will remain the same. Therefore it is a matter of time until the income wont be enough to pay all the expenses and costs.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": technological paradigm shift.
Explanation:
A paradigm shift takes place when the is a change in the methods and practices that were traditionally used and were conceived as main references due to the introduction of new ideas. Technological paradigm shifts are those caused by the creation of new technology that abruptly alters the market. For instance, the introduction of e-mails replaced faxes and courier services for mailing.
Answer:
shifts the short-run Phillips curve up
Explanation:
The Phillips curve is a graph that shows the relationship between inflation and unemployment. In the short run, there is an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. The Phillip curve submits that high inflation is the cost to pay for economic growth. economic growth is accompanied by low unemployment. In the long run, there is no trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
An increase in expected inflation leads to an upward shift of the Phillips curve in the short run. Unemployment would stay unchanged. While a decrease in expected inflation leads to a downward shift of the Phillips curve
Stagflation in the 1970s have disproved the Phillips curve. Stagflation is when there is high unemployment and high inflation
Answer:
4/11 and 6/15 dressers.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is the ability of a country to produce more of a product given the same resources than another country per unit time. It also applies when a country is able to produce same amount of goods with another country given less inputs.
So a country that produces more goods uses a more efficient process to get more output.
In this scenario a worker in Peru can produce 11 lamps or 4 dressers in a day and a worker in Canada can produce 15 lamps or 6 dressers in a day. Canada has absolute advantage in producing lamps and dressers, so importing these items will not be beneficial.
To get a balance where both countries will benefit a lamp will have to go for a ratio of each countrie's product to the opportunity cost.
That is for Peru to produce 4 dressers it will have opportunity cost of 11 lamps. So the ratio is 4/11.
Also for Canada to produce 6 dressers it will have opportunity cost of 15 lamps. So the ratio is 6/15.
Lamp should trade for between 4/11 to 6/15 dressers for both countries to benefit.
