<u>Explanation:</u>
Using the Miranda v. Arizona case as an example, we need to remember that M.r Mirinda was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping; which are part of the important issues society tries to avoid
In other words, he went against these important values and goals of society. Hence, there must be a balance between the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel over breaking other laws in the constitution.
Answer : In civil cases, the plaintiff has the burden of proving his case by a preponderance of the evidence.
Explanation: hope that helps
Answer:
Engel V. Vitale (School Prayer)- Freedom of religion
Explanation:
The Supreme Court concluded that school- mandated prayers were unconstitutional. Teaching prayers and encouraging recitation did not go in line with all religions, therefore, the Supreme Court ruled to just stop the praying.
For Congress, a veto needs a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate (a simple majority). There are 435 members in the House, so that means you need 290 votes.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
breach of the implied of merchantability
Explanation:
Implied warrant of merchantability happens when an individual such as jack in this question, goes to buy a product that did not work as expected. In this case, Jack requested for a Cola drink which he bought and later realized it was caustic drain cleaner. The warranty guarantees that the cola drink gotten from the fast food chain must work according to why it was purchased and the sellers are not required to explain to jack that Cola drink is what he was going to get when buying the product from them because the law on its own, creates that warranty.
