All categories

3 years ago

Which amendment does this belong to?

1 answer:

5 0

The right to free public school is found in the individual state constitutions, not in the federal constitution. Every state has a provision in its constitution, commonly called the "education article," that guarantees some form of free public education. In San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriquez, the U.S. Supreme Court held that education is not a "fundamental right" under the U.S. Constitution. So, as a matter of constitutional law, the founding fathers left it to the states to decide whether to provide an education or not.
The 14th amendment of the US Constitution talks about education.

You might be interested in

Explain common law larceny by false pretenses and Modern Fraud laws.

Otrada [13]

The crime of False Pretenses is also known as Theft by False Pretenses or Larceny by False Pretenses. The crime of False Pretenses requires: a false representation. of a material fact (past or present) with the intent to defraud.

A crime at common law. The illegal taking of the property of another with intent to deprive the owner thereof.

The main difference between false pretenses and larceny is that a thief who secures title is guilty of false pretenses while someone who secures possession through fraud is guilty of larceny by trick.

Hope it helps you:)

3 0

3 years ago

Who led the argument before the supreme court in the brown v. Board of education case and later became a supreme court justice?

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

<h3>Thurgood Marshall.</h3>

Explanation:

Thurgood Marshall was the first Supreme Court justice of African descend. He was a lawyer by profession and played an important role in bringing racial equality and liberty during the Civil Rights Movement.

Marshall became a lawyer for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and it was during this time he served as chief attorney for the plaintiffs in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. He successfully led the case and won a unanimous verdict against school segregation.

This case helped him gain lots of recognition and admiration. President Johnson appointed him as the first African-American Supreme Court justice in 1967.

8 0

3 years ago

Why do forensic technicians typically collect blood evidence before picking up weapons and other evidence? Because the Federal R

alina1380 [7]

Answer:

2nd one.

Explanation:

blood evidence should be tested immediately before effected by the environment to collect dna and calculate blood splatter angles. blood is more reliable than weapons as we cant always prove it was in possession of the offender at the time. if its a ballistic weapon that can be tracked through the serial number the weapon is not first priority. as they are not effected greatly by the environment as bio fluids are.

5 0

3 years ago

At trial in a criminal prosecution for theft, the defendant calls a witness to testify that he formerly knew the defendant as an

Alexus [3.1K]

Answer:

No. Should be no.

Explanation:

black marketeering has noting to do with prosecution because of theft.

BLACK MARKETEERING:

illegal traffic or trade in officially controlled commodities.

THEFT:

the physical removal of an object that is capable of being stolen without the consent of the owner and with the intention of depriving the owner of it permanently.

Black Marketeering pervention has nothing to do with stealing.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

______ is a complete defense to fraud as it is inconsistent with the defendant's intent to defraud or willfulness, purposes esse

geniusboy [140]

Option B is correct. <u>Good faith</u> is a complete defense to fraud as it is inconsistent with the defendant's intent to defraud or willfulness, purposes essential to the charges.

About Fraud

Fraud is a criminal offence as well as a civil tort. Allegations of fraud in civil litigation may be based on a negligently made or intentionally made factual misrepresentation. In order for a remark to be intentionally untrue, the speaker must have either known it was wrong or been careless about its veracity. Additionally, it must have been the speaker's intent for the listener to rely on the assertion. Then the promise must have been reasonably relied upon by the hearer, and that reasonable reliance must also have resulted in harm.

To know more about Misrepresentation:

brainly.com/question/28964131

#SPJ4

3 0

1 year ago