1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eva8 [605]
3 years ago
14

Match the definition to the term. 1 . dialects the language from which Indo-European came 2 . ziggurat sixteenth century religio

us reformer who translated the Bible into English 3 . Celts ancient people of the British Isles 4 . emigrate where Aryan-speaking people lived 5 . Indus Valley speech which is not standard 6 . Aryan to leave one's country 7 . Tyndale invaded England in 1066 AD 8 . Normans a very high tower
English
1 answer:
Kazeer [188]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1 . dialects: speech which is not standard

2 . ziggurat: a very high tower

3 . Celts: ancient people of the British Isles

4 . emigrate: to leave one's country

5 . Indus Valley: where Aryan-speaking people lived

6 . Aryan: the language from which Indo-European came

7 . Tyndale: sixteenth century religious reformer who translated the Bible into English

8 . Normans: invaded England in 1066 AD  

Explanation:

Dialects refers to the systematic differences in grammar and pronunciation of a language. Ziggurats are high towers in ancient Mesopotamia. The Celts were groups of prehistoric peoples who inhabited in various regions of Europe and Britain. Emigrate means to relocate abroad. The Indus Valley was a Bronze Age civilization in South Asia. Aryan is the language from which Indo-European languages derive. William Tyndale was an English scholar who translated the Bible from Hebrew and Greek into English. The Normans were groups of Scandinavian and Frankish peoples who settled in Normandy in around 912 and conquered England at the battle of Hastings.

You might be interested in
Read the following passage and answer the question. So he sent him to my office as a student at law, errand boy, and cleaner and
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

The correct answer is A. the value of hard work

Explanation:

The narrator of this story "Bartleby the Scrivener"  is a lawyer whos starts describing himself as an elderly man. He also describes the scrivenes who work with him. In this passage, he is describing Ginger Nut, who is not a scrivener but a young boy who has to do a lot of tasks, such as to be an errand boy, to clean and sweep, it means a lot of hard work.

3 0
3 years ago
Yoda has a distinctive way of speaking. His statement, "Afraid you will be," violates which property of the English language?
kirill [66]

Answer:

D. Language has a structure that is governed by rules

Explanation:

Human language is based on structure which is a set of rules. In normal statement like structure, subject, verb and object, is formal sentence rule. In this sentence, Yoda object in the beginning, instead of the end, and hence he makes a mistake. His sentence should run like "You will be afraid", instead of what it is. A speaker commits an error if he does not follow the rules of a language structure.

6 0
3 years ago
A summary of the new Jim Crow book version
enot [183]

Alexander details the history of “racialized social control” (20). From slavery to Jim Crow to mass incarceration, she identifies a persistent pattern by which systems of racial subjugation are built, maintained, dismantled, and finally transformed to fit the circumstances of a given era. In the case of mass incarceration, politicians like Ronald Reagan built the system to fit into a new post-Civil Rights Movement paradigm that prohibited politicians from making overtly racist appeals to American voters. In this new era of supposed colorblindness, Reagan—and later George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton—utilized “law and order” (50) rhetoric that implicitly demonized Black men as predators. In the middle of Reagan’s presidency, crack cocaine swept through urban communities of color, giving “tough on crime” advocates the perfect pretext to launch an aggressive drug enforcement campaign against Black American males.

 Alexander explains exactly how the new racial caste system works, beginning with its point of entry: the police. Empowered by Supreme Court decisions that effectively gutted the Fourth Amendment, police officers may stop and search individuals under the faintest pretexts of probable cause. Yet just because police departments can target millions of Americans suspected of possessing small amounts of drugs, the question remains of why they choose to divert time and resources away from addressing more serious crimes like murders and rapes. Alexander points to huge financial incentives offered by the federal government to encourage widespread enforcement of minor drug infractions. Massive federal cash grants and changes to civil asset forfeiture laws have made participation in the drug war extraordinarily lucrative for state and local police departments.

In the following chapter Alexander explores why, in many states, Black Americans make up as much as 80% to 90% of individuals who serve time in prison on drug charges, even though the system is formally colorblind and whites use and sell drugs at similar rates. Unlike in the case of robberies or assaults, where clear victims exist, those involved with drug transactions are unlikely to report them to the police because doing so would implicate themselves in a crime. As a result, police must be proactive in addressing drug crime and are therefore afforded an enormous amount of discretion concerning whom to target. As for why police departments choose to disproportionately target people of color, Alexander blames both implicit biases and pervasive media and political campaigns that frame Black men as criminals in the American imagination. Prosecutors are also granted an outsized amount of discretion thanks to the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for drug criminals. With such harsh sentences hanging over the heads of those charged with drug crimes, prosecutors are better empowered to extract plea deals. While these plea deals may keep an individual out of jail, they also frequently result in a felony record, saddling that person for life with what Alexander calls “the prison label” (189). The consequences of this prison label are the focus of Chapter 4. When an individual leaves prison or accepts a felony plea deal, they face legal discrimination in employment, housing, welfare benefits, and often voting rights. It is here that Alexander observes the strongest similarities between mass incarceration and the Jim Crow era, given that Black Americans faced these same forms of discrimination during the first half of the 20th century in the South. She also addresses the stigma felt by everyone touched by the criminal justice system, which includes the formerly incarcerated, their families, and any individual who can expect daily harassment from police officers. The following chapter outlines the specific similarities and differences between Jim Crow and mass incarceration. Aside from the legal discrimination in both systems, Jim Crow and mass incarceration have similar political roots. Both systems gained political support from elites who sought to exploit the economic and cultural fears of poor and working-class whites. Both operate by defining what it means to be Black in America in the cultural imagination—in the case of mass incarceration, that means defining Black men as criminals. Perhaps the most significant and frightening difference is that while both slavery and Jim Crow were systems of labor exploitation, mass incarceration involves marginalization and removal from society. Alexander points out that similar racially based marginalization efforts were precursors to genocides in the 20th century.

3 0
2 years ago
They said, Tomorrow is<br>ciuvies​
Artemon [7]

Answer:

yessir

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Can someone summarize the book THE SCYTHE by Neal Shutusterman?
antoniya [11.8K]
Two teens must learn the “art of killing” in the first book in a chilling new series from Neal Shusterman, author of the New York Times best selling Unwind dystology.

In a world where disease has been eliminated, the only way to die is to be randomly killed (“gleaned”) by professional reapers (“scythes”). Citra and Rowan are teenagers who have been selected to be scythe’s apprentices, and despite wanting nothing to do with the vocation, they must learn every method of ending life and come to understand the necessity of what they do.

Only one of them will be chosen as a scythe’s apprentice. And when it becomes clear that the winning apprentice’s first task will be to glean the loser, Citra and Rowan are pitted against each other in a fight for their lives.

Hope this helps.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the Crucible play about?
    9·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP
    12·2 answers
  • How should information in resumé bullets be written?. . a.using “I” statements, like “I have developed presentations for audienc
    5·2 answers
  • 1. Where were the first Portuguese settlements in Brazil?
    10·2 answers
  • Does zoos help or harm animals?? (Your opinion)
    5·2 answers
  • In ___ research, researchers form conclusions based on their own experiments and studies.
    7·1 answer
  • What is the main conflict of the story?
    8·1 answer
  • Write 1-2 sentences explaining why is honeycomb important to bees.
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone help me thank you.
    6·1 answer
  • Select the sentence with a verb phrase.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!