As evidence that Fawcett was "a remarkable man," the author shows that he was a very admirable explorer and was part of one of the most important geographical groups in Britain.
This can be seen in the lines:
- "Fawcett [...] as an honored member of Britain's renowned royal geographic society."
- "[...] He'd battle anacondas and electric eels, and how he'd emerge with maps of regions that no one had even came back from."
In this case, we can see that the author used the account of someone who studied Fawcett's life about his great deeds and how he was very good at what he did.
Fawcett was such an extraordinary man that even his disappearance is a curious thing and one that attracts the attention of all who want to know more about him.
In this case, we can say that the author's argument about Fawcett being an incredible man is effective because the author shows evidence to support it.
More information on the use of evidence at the link:
brainly.com/question/37503
Answer:
because either way that is your family, i am not sure what your dealing with but it gets better.
Explanation:
no matter if you were close to them or not its your blood so youre gonna miss them no matter what, moments may relive in your head also. but no matter what your brain has a system to miss people you may not always fully love.
Are you asking about our confession or is this a passage ?
(not meaning to take points, i'm sorry, just not sure ?)
Answer:
Which statement is the strongest counterclaim to the claim?
The campaign for women’s suffrage had actually begun with the Great Reform Act of 1832, long before the defaced penny was created.
Many other tactics, such as letter bombings and hunger strikes, were taking place at the same time that the defaced penny was being circulated.
The extremely slow process of redefining the British political nation began in the 1820s and took many decades to fully unfold.
The defaced penny was not created until 1903, so it could not possibly represent the true beginnings of women’s suffrage.
Explanation:
