Answer:
E). Inductive approach.
Explanation:
As per the given description, the research project adopts an inductive approach as the researcher deduces a generalized conclusion(in the form of theory) that 'violent behavior is a function of deviant subcultures' which is based on certain specific examples of evaluation('investigation of urban gangs and violence'). Such an approach is primarily inclined towards proposing broad and generalized deductions from certain specified examinations or observations that carries the scope to be verified or discerned as true or false which is correctly justified by the given example. Therefore, <u>option E</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
Number 4 would be the best answer.
Explanation:
Passing through each option, from a deductible, logical perspective:
- Number 3 cannot be concluded from the excerpt given.
- Number 1 could maybe be a possible answer, but can be dropped aside due to the fact that the speaker implies a certain level of pride to his statement, when he says that he has made the railroad 'race against time'. Hence, he would probably still want to keep building them!
- Number 2 is the one that is maybe best confused. As the conclusion 'Now it's done!' could very much either mean that all railroads have been completed, or that he hasn't found work anymore. This can be clarified by considering that he's talking about <em>a </em><em>railroad, </em>and that his whole speech has a certain emotional, almost poethical appeal to it. So the main point here isn't the general need for railroads, but rather the speaker's feelings and aflictions.
1. reusing
2. incineration
3. source reduction
4. recycling
hope this helps! although I do believe it is one of those opinion questions where no answer is wrong.
explanation: I believe that reusing and incineraton are the two best because they are the least wasteful. And while source reduction and recycling are good they aren't quite as efficient as the other two. Plus they are more time consuming.
