1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
skelet666 [1.2K]
3 years ago
14

Which power would give a president greater legislative power than the office currently has

History
1 answer:
Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
5 0

b

it is a different person of the govt who has this legislative power and Executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to maintain confidential communications under certain circumstances within the executive branch and to resist some subpoenas and other oversight by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of particular information or personnel relating to those confidential communications. The right comes into effect when revealing information would impair governmental functions. Neither executive privilege nor the oversight power of Congress is explicitly mentioned in the United States Constitution.[1] However, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that executive privilege and congressional oversight each are a consequence of the doctrine of the separation of powers, derived from the supremacy of each branch in its own area of Constitutional activity.[2]

The Supreme Court confirmed the legitimacy of this doctrine in United States v. Nixon in the context of a subpoena emanating from the judiciary, instead of emanating from Congress.[3] The Court held that there is a qualified privilege, which once invoked, creates a presumption of privilege, and the party seeking the documents must then make a "sufficient showing" that the "presidential material" is "essential to the justice of the case". Chief Justice Warren Burger further stated that executive privilege would most effectively apply when the oversight of the executive would impair that branch's national security concerns.[3] Regarding requests from Congress (instead of from the courts) for executive branch information, as of a 2014 study by the Congressional Research Service,[4] only two federal court cases had addressed the merits of executive privilege in such a context, and neither of those cases reached the Supreme Court.[5]

In addition to which branch of government is requesting the information, another characteristic of executive privilege is whether it involves a "presidential communications privilege" or instead a "deliberative process privilege" or some other type of privilege.[4] The deliberative process privilege is often considered to be rooted in common law, whereas the presidential communications privilege is often considered to be rooted in separation of powers, thus making the deliberative process privilege less difficult to overcome.[4][6] Generally speaking, presidents, congresses and courts have historically tended to sidestep open confrontations through compromise and mutual deference in view of previous practice and precedents regarding the exercise of executive privilege

You might be interested in
Describe the thirty years war (at least four sentences)
Charra [1.4K]
The Thirty Years' War was a war fought primarily in Central Europe between 1618 and 1648. One of the longest and most destructive conflicts in human history, as well as the deadliest European religious war in history, the war resulted in eight million fatalities.
3 0
3 years ago
What are the two most significant problems in the meatpacking industry
mojhsa [17]

Upton Sinclair's The Jungle: Muckraking the Meat-Packing Industry. Upton Sinclair wrote The Jungle to expose the appalling working conditions in the meat-packing industry. His description of diseased, rotten, and contaminated meat shocked the public and led to new federal food safety laws.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the following image referring to
Daniel [21]
It is B.................
6 0
3 years ago
Explain the Dred Scott lawsuit and how he felt his rights had been violated.
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
The Dred Scott decision, or lawsuit as you put it, was a case where it was stated by the court that people of African descent could not be American citizens and had no standing in court. They, whether free or not, had no power to regulate slavery in the United States. His rights have been violated for many reasons. He was accused of standing in court for just being black. It was very unconstitutional and found by many historians as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions ever made.
6 0
3 years ago
Which event under Jackson coincides with Republicanism?
vlada-n [284]

Answer: I think it was the Indian Removal act, but please don't report me if im wrong

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • If the Twenty-Second Amendment had been in place during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s first term in office,
    7·2 answers
  • Most maps do not rely on the use of symbols true or false
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following responsibilities best describes the duties of the state auditor and inspector?
    5·2 answers
  • What did abolitionists William Lloyd Garrison and Frederick Douglass have in common?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the division of labor make factories more productive?
    13·2 answers
  • Help please
    6·2 answers
  • Do you know any creeps?!?!?! That just keep following you every where you go?????
    5·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP! Will mark brainliest!
    8·2 answers
  • What is the main way that being camouflaged helps an animal?
    9·1 answer
  • Answer fast!!!
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!