Napoleon sold it to the United States for pennies per acre, and ended the period of French Colonialism in the midwestern portion of the landmass we now call the continental United States of America.
The Louisiana Purchase was the acquisition by the United States of 828,000 square miles (2,140,000 km²) of French territory ("Louisiana") in 1803. The cost was 60 million francs ($11,250,000) plus cancellation of debts worth 18 million francs ($3,750,000). Including interest, the U.S. finally paid $23,213,568 for the Louisiana territory. Not a bad deal.
We got the port of New Orleans as well as the navigation 'rights' on the Mississippi River and Missouri Rivers. It opened up a vast region that encompasses the current region of 15 states, which comprises around 23% of the territory of the United States today.
I can’t help with the battle of fort Sumter:
The intense Confederate artillery bombardment of Major Robert Anderson's small Union garrison in the unfinished fort in the harbor at Charleston, South Carolina, had been preceded by months of siege-like conditions.
This is basically the key events and what happened in this battle. Hope it helped a bit. God bless and good luck!!
Answer:barbarian tribes
Explanation:Barbarian tribes are made up of five different tribes in Europe they include the following
The Huns, The Franks,The Vandals, the Saxons, and the Visigoths (Goths), generally all Barbarian tribes hated Rome. The .major plan of the barbarian tribes was to destroy Rome.
During those periods the Romans consider anybody that does not speak Latin as a Barbarian.
DURING THE MEDIEVAL TIMES BETWEEN AD 406 AND 419 THE ROMANS LOST MOST PARTS OF THEIR EMPIRE TO DIFFERENT BARBARIAN TRIBES.
Concept of causation: When one event happens because of another.
In history, it is rarely the case that there is a single cause of an event. There are often multiple causes and factors and motivations that all play into the unfolding of historical happenings. Reformation historian Roland Bainton said, "The sum of the matter is that causation is exceedingly difficult to assess. One can do no more than offer a plausible conjecture." Bainton believed there were causes of events in history, but that there could be much investigation and debate about the complexity of those causes. That's part of our work as historians -- to investigate different possibilities and theses and see which are the most likely factors in causing events to unfold as they did. And as we make our assessment of causes, we remain open to the possibility that new evidence might surface that will change our understanding of causes of what happened in the past.
Could it be the syrian war?