1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sukhopar [10]
3 years ago
5

What were the beginnings of agriculture in the Americas

History
1 answer:
anzhelika [568]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

it was not until after 9500 BC that the eight so-called founder crops of agriculture appear: first emmer and einkorn wheat, then hulled barley, peas, lentils, bitter vetch, chick peas and flax

hope it helps

You might be interested in
What did government in the Italian peninsula look like in 1855?
Ugo [173]

The Italian peninsula's government was controlled by  either Austria or the papacy. Ultimately, this arrangement had to change when Prussia defeated Austria in 1866, and the latter had to concede Venetia in the name of Italy's unification. so the answer is a



8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the North agree to the Missouri Compromise?
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

A. It allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state.

Explanation:

In an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, the Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give a modern day example of an Oligarthy, Aristocracy, Timocracy, Democracy, and Tyranny
Deffense [45]
Oligarchy - China
Aristocracy - UK
Theocracy - Iran
Democracy - Norway
Tyranny - North Korea
6 0
3 years ago
The founding Fathers wanted to ensure that no one faction of the population could choose the president. How does the Supreme Cou
vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

The best answer to the question: How does the Supreme Court in the 2000 election challenge the original intent? Would be, A: Because the Supreme Court could be considered a faction.

Explanation:

Although essentially the Judicial branch was designed to become a neutral power, without any leanings towards a particular party, or a particular form of government, in the 2000 election, this line was crossed and many Americans started believing that this ideal of neutrality on the part of the Supreme Court, was crossed. Originally, the Court is supposed to become an interpreter of the Law, the U.S Constitution and other legislation, that impacts the outcomes of different activities in American life.

In the 2000 election, the Court had to intervene when a lawsuit was presented to challenge the election of George W. Bush as President, in the case Bush vs. Gore. The point was that in Florida´s election, it seemed that there had been a miscount of votes, which favored Bush, over Gore.

Although the initial suit was taken up by the Florida Supreme Court, the matter reached all the way to the U.S Supreme Court, and they stepped in, on account of supposed violations to the Fourteenth Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause. Arguing protection of Floridian voters´ rights, the Court stopped the counting and made a decision. In this form, they favored Bush, over Gore, and thus were considered to have become partisan. Something the Founding Fathers had not intended to happen when they Framed the Constitution. They became a faction at that point which highly favored Bush and his party, by basically giving him the Presidency.  

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did some policy makers feel the US had to switch from isolationism
Digiron [165]

<u>Answer:</u>

Some of the United States policymakers believed that they should switch from isolationism to a more expanding role around the world because, without the United States’ intervention, many fascist powers around the world were taking deeper roots and that was believed would turn out to be dangerous for the United States in the future.

<u>Explanation:</u>

  • Some policymakers believed that it was the responsibility of the United States government to eradicate fascism and radicalism that was flourishing in many countries of the east.
  • They argued that if the United States government doesn’t intervene and stop the growth of fascism, it would be troublesome for the United States in the future to counter the fascist powers later.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best explains the relationship among these tree facts?
    13·1 answer
  • True or false. There is no limit of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution
    9·1 answer
  • Big corporations grew rapidly because of:
    14·2 answers
  • What was President Jackson's plan for dealing with Native Americans?
    11·1 answer
  • When did the ottomans try to invade Europe and how many times did they try to invade Europe? who were the rulers at the time?
    9·1 answer
  • Which was an advantage for the Americans during the American Revolution?
    11·1 answer
  • What does the Fifth Amendment concern?
    9·1 answer
  • You heard lemongrab, get in. Now. NOW. I SAID GET DAFUQ IN NOW
    14·2 answers
  • Describe the location of the tang and song dynasties relative to two land based geographic featured
    15·1 answer
  • How did the building of railroads across America contribute to the country's economic growth
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!