Answer:
When labor productivity is high.
Explanation:
According to neoclassical economic theory, real wages are equal to the marginal product of labor (MLP). The marginal product of labor is the extra output produced by one extra unit of labor (one extra worker).
If the MPL is high, this means that workers are very productive, and therefore, are paid a high real wage accordingly.
This is why countries with high labor productivity like the U.S. or Switzerland also have very high real wages.
Answer:
These two options represent nominal values:
-The price of a beignet is $3.00 in 2011.
-Maria's wage is $27.00 per hour in 2011.
They are expressed in monetary value without taking into account inflation, or without being represented in terms of something else.
This option represents real value:
-The price of a beignet is 0.33 paperback novels in 2011.
The price of a beignet, nominally $3.00 is being expressed in relation to the price of something else: paperback novels, whose nominal price is $9.00.
In other words, in real terms, a beignet costs a third of what a paperback novel costs.
Answer:
The correct option is A, Samantha weed and Adam will rake because these are the goods each has a comparative advantage in.
Explanation:
The opportunity formula comes handy in this case, which is given below:
opportunity cost formula=what one sacrifices/what one gains
If Samantha were to weed flower beds, opportunity cost is computed thus:
Opportunity cost of Samantha weeding flower beds=8/4= 2 bags of leaves raked
The opportunity of Adam weeding flower beds=25/5 =5 bags of leaves raked.
In a nutshell ,if Samantha weeds flowers they would lose 2 bags of leaves raked while if Adam were to do so same, they would lose 5 bags of leaves raked, conclusively Samantha should weed flower beds since she has lower opportunity, higher comparative advantage
Answer:
can you please tell me the question because it's kind of blurry and I will be glad to answer it if I can
Answer:
$7,000 gift will be worth $19,922 after 17 years ( or 68 quarters) given the discount rate is 6.2% compounded quarterly.
Explanation:
The worth of $7,000 nowadays after 17 years is equal to its future value compounded for the time of 17 years or 68 quarters.
As the discounted rate is 6.2% compounded quarterly, we have:
Compounding period = 17 x 4 = 68; Interest rate = 6.2%/4 = 1.55%.
Apply the formula for future value to determine the value of $7,000 in 17 years as: 7,000 x (1+1.55%) ^68 = $19,922.
Thus, the answer is $19,922.
